Examining the Impact of Student-Centered Management in Universities on the Effectiveness of Education and Students’ Academic Performance
Keywords:
Student-centered management, Educational effectiveness, Academic performance, Participatory governance, Active learning, Mentorship, Higher educationAbstract
This study aimed to examine the impact of student-centered management (SCM) practices in universities on educational effectiveness and students’ academic performance. This research employed a sequential exploratory mixed-method design consisting of a qualitative phase followed by a quantitative validation phase. In the first phase, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify the key dimensions of student-centered management, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis using NVivo 14 software, producing six core dimensions: active learning practices, advising and mentorship, participatory decision-making, feedback timeliness, support services integration, and flexible assessment. In the second phase, a structured questionnaire derived from the qualitative findings was administered to 200 university students in Tehran, Iran, selected through simple random sampling. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, employing descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and multiple regression analyses to assess the predictive relationships between SCM dimensions, educational effectiveness, and academic performance. Inferential results indicated that SCM significantly predicts both educational effectiveness (R² = 0.52, p < .001) and academic performance (R² = 0.45, p < .001). Among SCM dimensions, active learning practices (β = 0.31, p < .001), advising and mentorship (β = 0.21, p = .002), and feedback timeliness (β = 0.17, p = .010) were the strongest predictors of educational effectiveness. Furthermore, educational effectiveness mediated the relationship between SCM and academic performance, suggesting that the management approach enhances achievement primarily through improved teaching quality and engagement. Student-centered management substantially enhances the quality of education and academic performance by fostering active learning, effective mentorship, and timely feedback. Integrating participatory governance and adaptive management strategies can strengthen institutional effectiveness and student outcomes in higher education settings.
Downloads
References
1. Rahman NUQ. The Influence of School-Based Management and Leadership on Student Academic Achievement. Mozaic Islam Nusantara. 2025;11(2):115-24. doi: 10.47776/mozaic.v11i2.1811.
2. Nevhudoli D. Decolonizing Universities Pedagogy in Creating Space for an Engaged Teaching and Learning. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2025;39(2). doi: 10.20853/39-2-6675.
3. Ruslandi U, Istikhori I, Rizkiyana A. Peranan Kepemimpinan Manajemen Pendidikan Dalam Sekolah. Katalis. 2025;2(1):40-50. doi: 10.62383/katalis.v2i1.1197.
4. Dabie PK, Asare J. Revisiting Transformational Leadership in U.S. Higher Education: A Critical Conceptual Review. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 2025;7(9):673-84. doi: 10.51594/ijarss.v7i9.2039.
5. Haluti F, Aimang HA, Gallardo BO. Building Principal Leadership Oriented to Improving Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser. 2024;8(2):219-27. doi: 10.32529/glasser.v8i2.3743.
6. Abudetse RK. Governance Practices and Leadership Styles as Determinants of Institutional Performance in Colleges of Education in the Volta Region of Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice. 2025;9(6):61-83. doi: 10.47941/jep.3231.
7. Nguyen VC. The Role of University Leadership in Managing Strategic Quality Development in Higher Education. International Journal of Humanities Literature & Arts. 2025;8(1):56-62. doi: 10.21744/ijhla.v8n1.2430.
8. Román-Acosta D. Academic Leadership in Times of Change: A View From the University of Zulia and Argentina. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education. 2024;3:628. doi: 10.56294/mw2024628.
9. Bridges S. Conceptualising, Evaluating and Supporting the Development of Cosmopolitan Values in Internationalised Higher Education: A Capabilities Approach. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2023;20(5). doi: 10.53761/1.20.5.17.
10. Zhumukova A. Adaptive Management as a Tool for Reducing Teacher Burnout. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2025;11(9):524-32. doi: 10.33619/2414-2948/118/63.
11. Manaseri H. Bridging Research to Practice: Transformative Inclusive Postsecondary Training Through a Visual Lens. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2025:1-16. doi: 10.1108/jarhe-10-2024-0585.
12. Harianto JE. The Role of Participatory Management in Improving Teacher Performance and Student Achievement. Global. 2024;2(9):2152-64. doi: 10.59613/global.v2i9.306.
13. Permono GK, Wanodya A, Wahyuningsih S, Rojaenah S, Nyoman NA. Strategi Perencanaan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Pembiayaan Pendidikan Untuk Peningkatan Raport Pendidikan Di SDN Sambeng Kecamatan Todanan. Cetta Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2025;8(3):436-46. doi: 10.37329/cetta.v8i3.4469.
14. Fayez TMA. The Role of Participatory Leadership in Developing Creativity and Increasing Teachers’ Motivation Toward Teaching in Saudi Schools. مجلة العلوم التربوية و الدراسات الإنسانية. 2024(42):1134-62. doi: 10.55074/hesj.vi42.1221.
15. Elinina Kara San Jose R. The Interplay of School Governance, Resource Management and Participatory Decision-Making for School Performance Optimization. International Journal of Research Publications. 2024;148(1). doi: 10.47119/ijrp1001481520246423.
16. Abdul A-HM, Hamad BAH. The Effect of the Participatory Learning Method on Motor Satisfaction and Learning to Perform the Skill of Shooting From the Shoulder Level in Handball for Students. International Academic Journal of Education and Literature. 2022;3(03):77-85. doi: 10.47310/iajel.2022.v03i03.010.
17. Suro LA, Anggraeni AF. Targeting Educational Quality: The Role of Educator Management Transformation in Enhancing Services. Bamj. 2024;2(1):25-37. doi: 10.61987/bamj.v2i1.543.
18. Mayisela T, Govender S, Hodgkinson‐Williams C. Open Learning as a Means of Advancing Social Justice. 2022. doi: 10.47622/9781928502425.
19. Lister K, Riva E, Kukulska‐Hulme A, Fox C. Participatory Digital Approaches to Embedding Student Wellbeing in Higher Education. Frontiers in Education. 2022;7. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.924868.
20. Khamis T, Naseem A, Khamis A, Petrucka P. The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Catalyst for Creativity and Collaboration for Online Learning and Work-Based Higher Education Systems and Processes. Journal of Work-Applied Management. 2021;13(2):184-96. doi: 10.1108/jwam-01-2021-0010.
21. Ju-Zaveroni Y, Lee S. Online Language Learning in Participatory Culture: Digital Pedagogy Practices in the Post-Pandemic Era. Education Sciences. 2023;13(12):1217. doi: 10.3390/educsci13121217.
22. Anapey GM. Exploring AI and Dialogic Education Outcomes From a Learning Sciences Perspective. 2024:147-61. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9962-7.ch008.
23. Andiani L, Pebriyanti N, Lestari TD, Solihat YN. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Syura Terhadap Motivasi Dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Joupi. 2024;2(3). doi: 10.62007/joupi.v2i3.342.
24. Jamir AM, Joseph PFS. A Study on Rethinking Leadership Styles in Nagaland’s Private Colleges for Contextual Relevance and Impact. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. 2025;XII(VI):2118-26. doi: 10.51244/ijrsi.2025.120600171.
25. Destari D. Analysis the Quality of Human Resources and the Effectiveness of Higher Education Management on Student Academic Performance at Universities in Samarinda, East Kalimantan. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations. 2023;1(03):84-96. doi: 10.58812/esle.v1i03.157.
26. Kunnari I, Maetoloa K. Empowering Capacity Building – The Implementation and Impacts of the EMVITET Project. Journal of Technical Education Science. 2022(70A):1-12. doi: 10.54644/jte.70a.2022.1226.
27. Justin AT, Ajani MO. Participatory Drama and Sex Education: Fadehan International College Ile-Ife, Osun State – Nigeria Experience. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 2025;IX(I):4108-18. doi: 10.47772/ijriss.2025.9010319.
28. McKendree RB, McKim AJ. Teacher Changing the Discipline: A Case Study of Participatory Professional Development. Journal of Agricultural Education. 2021;62(3):72-84. doi: 10.5032/jae.2021.03072.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alireza Farhang Esfahani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.