Managerial Factors Influencing the Empowerment of Student Teachers: Developing and Validating a Model Based on a Mixed-Methods Approach (Qualitative–Qualitative–Quantitative)

Authors

    Marzieh Nazarizadeh PhD Student in Higher Education - Higher Education Development Planning, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
    Abasalt Khorasani * Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran Khorasani@sbu.ac.ir
    Gholamreza Shams Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
    Ayoub Ebrahimi Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

empowerment, organizational factors affecting empowerment, student teacher empowerment

Abstract

Achieving school effectiveness requires the empowerment of teachers within schools. Teacher empowerment is a critical factor in improving the quality of education, benefiting learners, teachers, schools, and the broader educational landscape. Therefore, the present study aimed to design and validate the managerial factors that influence the empowerment of student teachers. The research employed a sequential exploratory strategy with a mixed-methods approach (qualitative meta-synthesis – qualitative interviews – quantitative validation). Participants in the meta-synthesis phase included all Persian and English books, research studies, and scholarly works conducted in the field of empowerment between 2010 and 2024, resulting in the selection of 61 studies. In the interview phase, participants consisted of experts, professors, and specialists from teacher education universities who were engaged in the development and empowerment of students, student teachers, and related areas of educational development and human capital empowerment. Using purposive and snowball sampling, 17 experts were selected. In the quantitative phase, the statistical population consisted of student teachers enrolled during the 2024–2025 academic year, among whom 90 individuals were selected as the sample. Data collection instruments included a checklist for the qualitative meta-synthesis phase, semi-structured interviews with experts, and a researcher-made questionnaire for the quantitative phase. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were confirmed by field specialists. For data analysis, thematic analysis was used in the qualitative phase, while descriptive and inferential statistics were applied in the quantitative phase using SPSS and SmartPLS 3.8 software. Overall, the findings indicated that managerial factors influencing the empowerment of student teachers can be conceptualized in three main domains: managerial styles (five components), management tasks (seven components), and managerial competencies (six components). The results of structural equation modeling confirmed the validity of the proposed model. Based on these findings, it appears that the process of enhancing teachers’ capabilities and performance, as well as formulating effective educational policies and practices, strongly depends on professional development activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Yalçın MT, Atasoy R, Göçen A. Trust, Professionalism and Empowerment: How School Leaders Shape Instructional Practices. European Journal of Education. 2025;60(2). doi: 10.1111/ejed.70087.

2. Mokhlis S, Abdullah AH. The impact of teacher empowerment on schools' innovation climate. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). 2025;19(1):322-9. doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21633.

3. Norman E, Masruri A, Wahid J, Hasbian Y. Managing Teacher Competence Improvement through Leadership, Professional Development, and Digital Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Educational Management Research. 2025;4(6):2135-70.

4. Gunn TM, McRae PA. Better understanding the professional and personal factors that influence beginning teacher retention in one Canadian province. Int J Educ Res Open. 2021;2:100073. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100073.

5. Naghizadeh F, Nazem F, Afkaneh S. Identifying the Factors of Psychological Empowerment in Female High School Teachers. Iranian journal of educational sociology. 2025;8(3):1-11.

6. Ma L, Zhou F, Liu H. Relationship between psychological empowerment and the retention intention of kindergarten teachers: a chain intermediary effect analysis. Frontiers in psychology. 2021;12:601992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601992.

7. Akgun N. The Relation between Learning-Centered Leadership and Structural Empowerment of Teachers. International online journal of educational sciences. 2021;13(4).

8. Kang MM, Park S, Sorensen LC. Empowering the frontline: internal and external organizational antecedents of teacher empowerment. Public Management Review. 2022;24(11):1705-26. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1919185.

9. Fitriani F, Bahri S, Hastangka H. PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE TEACHERS' PEDAGOGIC COMPETENCE IN IMPLEMENTING DIFFERENTIATED. Jurnal As-Salam. 2025;9(1):17-31. doi: 10.37249/assalam.v9i1.806.

10. Akhtar S, Akhtar N. The Role of leadership style and teachers' performance at primary level: an exploratory study. Voyage J Educ Stud. 2024;4:83-96. doi: 10.58622/vjes.v4i1.124.

11. Nachshoni A. The impact of principal on teacher motivation in secondary schools. J Artif Intell Gen Sci. 2024;4:27-44. doi: 10.60087/jaigs.vol4.issue1.p44.

12. Wang F, Liu H, Fan M. The relationship between transformational leadership and teacher autonomy: A latent moderation analysis. Acta Psychologica. 2024;249:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104444.

13. Wasserman E, Ben-eli S, Yehoshua O, Gal R. Relationship between the Principal's leadership style and teacher motivation. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2016;15:180-92.

14. Wasliman I, Fatkhullah FK. Management of Teacher Competency Development and Training in Improving Learning Quality. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation. 2022;6(3):520-8. doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i3.52673.

15. Jelagat Yego S, Amimo C, Mendoza-Role E. Relationship between instructional supervision and Teacher's performance among public secondary schools in Nandi north Sub-County, Kenya. East Afr J Educ Soc Sci. 2020;1:90-7. doi: 10.46606/eajess2020v01i02.0024.

16. Iqbal S, Ali A. Education and professional development: opportunities and challenges for in-service teachers: a review. Gomal Univ J Res. 2024;40:117-33. doi: 10.51380/gujr-40-01-10.

17. Collier S, Trimmer K, Bryce I, Krishnamoorthy G. Validating the barriers and enablers for teachers accessing professional development of trauma informed pedagogy. Soc Sci Human Open. 2022;6:100332. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100332.

18. Denston A, Martin R, Fickel L, O'Toole V. Teachers' perspectives of social-emotional learning: informing the development of a linguistically and culturally responsive framework for social-emotional wellbeing in Aotearoa New Zealand. Teach Teach Educ. 2022;117:103813. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103813.

19. Irnidayanti Y, Maulana R, Helms-Lorenz M, Fadhilah N. Relationship between teaching motivation and teaching behaviour of secondary education teachers in Indonesia. Infancia y Aprendizaje. 2020;43:271-308. doi: 10.1080/02103702.2020.1722413.

20. Tveitnes MS, Lied SI, Berge RL, Olsen MH. Mainstream teachers' competence in inclusive special education: a study of Norwegian teachers' self-reported professional knowledge. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2025:1-18. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2025.2511353.

21. Abidogun A. The immense influence of motivation on teachers' effectiveness in the teaching job in Lagos state Nigeria. Mimbar Pendidikan. 2023;8:89-100. doi: 10.17509/mimbardik.v8i1.68012.

22. Ahrari S, Roslan S, Zaremohzzabieh Z, Mohd Rasdi R, Abu Samah A. Relationship between teacher empowerment and job satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic path analysis. Cogent Education. 2021;8(1):1898737. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1898737.

23. Berhanu KZ. Relationship between pedagogical leadership and teachers' job performance as mediated by organizational commitment. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2023;22:243-58. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.22.11.13.

24. Ahmed EI. Teacher empowerment and organisational citizenship behaviour in public schools in Saudi Arabia. Management in Education. 2024;38(1):22-9. doi: 10.1177/08920206211030929.

25. Rahman MA, Santosa AB, Sihotang H. The influence of Principal's leadership, teacher performance and internal quality assurance system in improving the quality of education in vocational high school. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. 2020;7:162-75.

26. Shlaga MH. Psychological Stability and its Relationship to responsibility among Baghdad university Teachers. International Journal of Body, Mind & Culture. 2025;12(4). doi: 10.61838/ijbmc.v12i4.867.

27. Díez F, Villa A, López AL, Iraurgi I. Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: educational policies and management processes. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03824.

28. Setiawan A, Hanim Z, Komariyah L, Salim NA. Empowerment Management Of High School Teachers In Kutai Kartanegara. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS). 2020;3(12):74-82.

29. Pardosi J, Utari TI. Effective principal leadership behaviors to improve the teacher performance and the student achievement. F1000Research. 2022;10:465-29. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51549.2.

30. Sariakin S, Yeni M, Usman MB, Mare AS, Munzir M, Saleh M. Fostering a productive educational environment: The roles of leadership, management practices, and teacher motivation. Frontiers in Education. 2025;10:1499064.

31. Kaso N, Aswar N, Firman F, Ilham D. The relationship between principal leadership and teacher performance with student characteristics based on local culture in senior high schools. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen. 2019;7:87-98. doi: 10.56457/jimk.v7i2.129.

32. Hans A, Hans E. Classroom management is prerequisite for effective teaching. Int J English Educ. 2017;6:273-83. doi: 10.5005/jp/books/12996_9.

33. Sharar T, Nawab A. Teachers' perceived teacher leadership practices: a case of private secondary schools in Lahore, Pakistan. Soc Sci Hum Open. 2020;2:100049. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049.

34. Shen J, Wu H, Reeves P, Zheng Y, Ryan L, Anderson D. The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: a meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2020;31:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357.

35. Kiral B. The relationship between the empowerment of teachers by school administrators and organizational commitments of teachers. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching. 2020;7(1):248-65.

36. Schott C, van Roekel H, Tummers LG. Teacher leadership: a systematic review, methodological quality assessment and conceptual framework. Educ Res Rev. 2020;31:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100352.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22

Submitted

2025-08-02

Revised

2025-10-23

Accepted

2025-11-04

How to Cite

Nazarizadeh, M. ., Khorasani, A., Shams, G. ., & Ebrahimi, A. . (2025). Managerial Factors Influencing the Empowerment of Student Teachers: Developing and Validating a Model Based on a Mixed-Methods Approach (Qualitative–Qualitative–Quantitative). Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 3(4), 1-17. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/128

Similar Articles

1-10 of 105

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.