Identifying the Drivers of Developing AI-Based Physical Education Teaching Methods in Primary Schools

Authors

    Zahra Mardanzadeh Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Sho.C., Islamic Azad University, shoushtar, Iran.
    Seyedeh Nahid Shetab Boushehri * Associate Professor, Department of Sports Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran nahid.shetab@yahoo.com
    Atousa Ghaseminezhad Dehkordi Department of Physical Education, Ahv.C., Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
    Shahram Alam Department of physical Education, YI.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/japes.166

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence; physical education; primary schools; fuzzy Delphi; educational innovation; digital pedagogy; instructional drivers

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the key drivers influencing the development and transformation of physical education teaching methods in primary schools through the integration of artificial intelligence. This qualitative exploratory study employed a fuzzy Delphi method to gather expert consensus on factors shaping AI-based instructional development in physical education. The research population consisted of specialists in artificial intelligence, educational technology, and physical education pedagogy, including university faculty members and national-level practitioners with a minimum of ten years of relevant academic or professional experience. Using purposive and snowball sampling, 15 experts were selected based on criteria of expertise, experience diversity, and willingness to participate. Data collection involved systematic document analysis using a structured extraction form, followed by semi-structured interviews guided by a protocol focused on AI trends, uncertainties, and drivers in physical education. Qualitative data were analyzed using the three-level abstraction laddering approach of Miles and Huberman (1994), moving from descriptive coding to thematic categorization and analytical interpretation. A two-round fuzzy Delphi process screened 112 initial codes, removing low-consensus items and resulting in 86 confirmed indicators that were subsequently synthesized into final driver categories. The inferential results demonstrated that AI-driven transformation in physical education relies on a multi-dimensional set of 25 key drivers spanning technological infrastructure, teacher capacity-building, institutional and policy support, pedagogical innovation, cultural readiness, and ethical considerations. Experts emphasized that modern digital infrastructure, teacher training in AI, ministry-level strategy alignment, and smart educational content are the strongest positive predictors of successful AI adoption. However, concerns were raised regarding reduced human interaction, technological dependency, and widening educational inequality, suggesting significant systemic moderation effects that influence the feasibility and sustainability of AI-based instructional change. The study concludes that achieving effective AI integration in primary school physical education requires holistic alignment across technology, pedagogy, governance, culture, and equity, highlighting the need for coordinated national strategies, targeted teacher development, and context-sensitive implementation frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sharma P. AI-Driven Pedagogy: Innovations in Educational Technology. 2025. doi: 10.59646/ap/313.

2. Sales X. The Teaching Challenges of AI in Higher Education. 2025:57-74. doi: 10.63782/pf24004.

3. qizi UIS. AI in Education: Pedagogical Innovations and Their Impact on Teachers and Students. American Journal of Philological Sciences. 2025;5(5):136-9. doi: 10.37547/ajps/volume05issue05-36.

4. Perse RJP. Using Artificial Intelligence in High School Education: A Review. 2025. doi: 10.20944/preprints202504.1727.v1.

5. Nigam D. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Teaching and Learning Process. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 2025;7(5). doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56046.

6. Mukherjee A, Sarkar D, Biswas M. Critical Analysis of AI Integration in Physical Science Teaching at the Secondary School Level. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 2025;IX(VII):996-1001. doi: 10.47772/ijriss.2025.90700080.

7. Monika M. AI-Edvolution: Transforming Teaching Through Intelligent Systems. Interantional Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. 2025;09(06):1-9. doi: 10.55041/ijsrem50643.

8. Marcos L. A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Transforming Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. 2025. doi: 10.20944/preprints202505.0414.v1.

9. Li J. Artificial Intelligence-Driven High School English Reading Instruction. Helios. 2025;2(1). doi: 10.70702/bdb/rbjy9268.

10. Kumari K, Al-Hawary SIS, Natarajan R, Vasudevan A. The Algorithmic Adjuvant: Synthesizing Human Pedagogy and Artificial Intelligence in the Modern ESL Classroom With Insights From Uzbekistan. Ais. 2025;6(3):246-52. doi: 10.62754/ais.v6i3.217.

11. Kotsis KΤ. Artificial Intelligence for Physics Education in STEM Classrooms: A Narrative Review Within a Pedagogy Technology Policy Framework. Sch Jo Phs Ed. 2025;6(3):204-11. doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i3.2148.

12. Kanvaria VK. Artificial Intelligence Tools in Mathematics Education: A Theoretical Inquiry Into Their Transformative Potential. Thiagarajar College of Preceptors Edu Spectra. 2025;7(2):29-37. doi: 10.34293/eduspectra.v7i2.05.

13. Jaloliddin JS. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Enhance English Learning in Early Grades. American Journal of Philological Sciences. 2025;5(6):226-8. doi: 10.37547/ajps/volume05issue06-59.

14. Han P-C. Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2025:387-408. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-5102-5.ch014.

15. Gupta S, Sharma P, Vajrala KR, Fatima A, Sharma N. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Education: Advancing Personalized Learning Within Ethical Frameworks: An Overview. EthAIca. 2025;4:418. doi: 10.56294/ai2025418.

16. Dubey P, Crevar AR. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. 2025:181-208. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-0502-8.ch008.

17. Doğan A. Using Artificial Intelligence in Primary School Mathematics Teaching. 2025:319-48. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1998-8.ch011.

18. Devi CM, Gobinath A, Ilango D. Artificial Intelligence in Training and Education. 2025:143-62. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1275-0.ch007.

19. Bushuyev S, Puziichuk A, Bushuyeva N, Bushuyeva V, Bushuyev D. The Evolving Landscape of Education Under the Influence of Ai. Bulletin of Ntu Khpi Series Strategic Management Portfolio Program and Project Management. 2025(2(9)):3-8. doi: 10.20998/2413-3000.2024.9.1.

20. Bianchi L, Stefano Marco Maria De R. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Applications in Education. Ijeit. 2025;1(1):13-27. doi: 10.64056/4ppeqb91.

21. Bhavana S. Advanced AI Approaches in Education. 2025:1-16. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-8965-2.ch001.

22. Agherai O, Aoula ES, Ahriz S. AI Applications in Education: A Review. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies. 2025;19:33-8. doi: 10.46300/9109.2025.19.4.

23. Aarthi S, Ravikumar RN, Khudayberganov S, Ismailov A, Khujaniyozova OR. Using Intelligent Tutoring Systems to Enhance Student Engagement. 2025:155-88. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1827-1.ch008.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Submitted

2025-07-26

Revised

2025-11-18

Accepted

2025-11-20

How to Cite

Mardanzadeh, Z., Shetab Boushehri, S. N., Ghaseminezhad Dehkordi , A., & Alam, S. (2026). Identifying the Drivers of Developing AI-Based Physical Education Teaching Methods in Primary Schools. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.61838/japes.166

Similar Articles

1-10 of 137

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.