When Words Keep Flowing: How Altruistic Teaching Shapes Writing Fluency and Boredom in the Iranian EFL Classroom

Authors

Keywords:

altruistic teaching, writing fluency, L2 boredom, Positive Psychology, EFL writing

Abstract

Drawing on positive psychology and, specifically, Fredrickson’s (2001) Broaden-and-Build Theory, this mixed-methods study examined the effects of an altruistic teaching intervention on the writing fluency and foreign language boredom of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Fifty female intermediate learners (ages 14–17) at a private language institute in Shahrekord were assigned to two intact classes. Over twelve 90-minute sessions, the experimental group received writing instruction infused with altruistic teaching practices—learners writing for and responding to authentic audiences—while the comparison group received conventional instruction. Writing fluency was operationalized as words per T-unit and measured through parallel argumentative pre- and post-tests; boredom was assessed with the Boredom in Practical English Language Classes Questionnaire (BPELC; Kruk & Zawodniak, 2017), and semi-structured interviews with 10–15 learners supplied qualitative data. ANCOVA results showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in writing fluency, F(1, 47) = 10.003, p = .003, partial η² = .175, and reported significantly lower L2 boredom, F(1, 47) = 13.346, p < .001, partial η² = .221. Thematic analysis attributed these gains to interactive activities, learner autonomy, meaningful tasks, and emotional support. The findings suggest that altruistic teaching functions as a positive-psychology intervention that simultaneously builds writing fluency and reduces L2 boredom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ellis R, Yuan F. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2004;26(1):59-84. doi: 10.1017/S0272263104261034.

2. Zeraatpishe M, Seifoori Z, Hadidi Tamjid N. The impact of multiple intelligence-oriented writing tasks on the accuracy, fluency, and organization of ELT students' writing. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice. 2020;12(25):1-31.

3. Kaveh A, Rassaei E. Mobile-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Dynamic Assessment, EFL Learners' Writing Fluency, and Strategy Awareness: A Sociocultural Perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory. 2022;9(1):34-68. doi: 10.1558/lst.20288.

4. Yu S. Profiling Second Language Writing Teachers: Discourses From the Published Literature. Future in Educational Research. 2025;3(2):207-23. doi: 10.1002/fer3.70000.

5. Wang J, Liu RD, Ding Y, Xu L, Liu Y, Zhen R. Teacher’s Autonomy Support and Engagement in Math: Multiple Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy, Intrinsic Value, and Boredom. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01006.

6. Borgonovi F, Pokropek M, Pokropek A. Relations between Academic Boredom, Academic Achievement, ICT Use, and Teacher Enthusiasm among Adolescents. Computers & Education. 2023;200(1):104807-12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104807.

7. Cui G, Chen J, Wang C, Zhang C, Zhang X, Hu Y. Dampening Effects of Perceived Teacher Enthusiasm on Class-Related Boredom in College Students: Longitudinal Mediation Effects of Perceived Task Value. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712441.

8. Dewaele JM, Li C. Teacher enthusiasm and students' social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research. 2021;25(6):922-45. doi: 10.1177/13621688211014538.

9. Rezayi M, Noorouzi P. The Role of Motivational Beliefs in Reducing Job Boredom Among Physical Education Teachers. Quarterly Journal of Social Psychology. 2020;7(2):142-59.

10. Vahedinia M, Akbari Daghi H, Gharib H. The relationship between irrational thoughts and communication beliefs with marital boredom among teacher (Master's Married teachers in Gonbad County, Master's thesis, Gonbad, Iran. 2019.

11. Tola Chala G. The Effects of Reflective Writing on EFL Student-Teachers' Critical Thinking: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2025. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05643-9.

12. Syukran R, Adriansyah A, Alimir IJ, Syafitri W, Sesmiarni Z, Bayu EPS. Exploring Teachers' Experiences in Integrating SAMR-Based Adaptive Technology in Primary English Reading-Writing Instruction. El-Rusyd. 2025;10(2):330-8. doi: 10.58485/elrusyd.v10i2.535.

13. Sadigova SI, Aliyeva DKR, Ahmadova VS, Rzayeva DG, Aliyeva KM, Huseynova DF. Teachers’ Views on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing and Providing Feedback on EFL Academic Writing in Azerbaijan. 2026. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9514620/v1.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ansari Cholcheh, F., Riahipour, P., & Rahimi Esfahani, F. (2027). When Words Keep Flowing: How Altruistic Teaching Shapes Writing Fluency and Boredom in the Iranian EFL Classroom. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1-14. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/328

Similar Articles

71-80 of 155

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.