Extraction and Elucidation of the Components of the Philosophical Foundations of Environmental Education at the Upper Secondary Level
Keywords:
Philosophical foundations, Environmental education, Upper secondary education, Educational modelAbstract
The environment is in a critical condition, and education and training are essential to address its challenges. The purpose of this study is to extract and elucidate the components of the philosophical foundations of environmental education in order to propose a model for upper secondary education. The research employed a qualitative approach, utilizing meta-synthesis and theoretical inference methods. This study examined sources and articles related to the philosophical foundations of environmental education and used purposive sampling to collect data. The data collection instrument consisted of coding sheets, and data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that the educational model of environmental education comprises ontological, anthropological, epistemological, and axiological components. In addition, objectives such as the development of environmental ethics, the growth of spirituality, and the enhancement of environmental culture were identified as key outcomes of the study. Fundamental principles include viewing humans as stewards of nature, environmental justice, and coexistence. Instructional methods encompass education grounded in Islamic foundations, participation and experiential learning, critical thinking, and knowledge-based approaches. Ultimately, the study demonstrates that the success of environmental education at the upper secondary level depends on the institutionalization of philosophical components within an operational model that cultivates a generation that is conscious of and committed to ecosystem sustainability.
Downloads
References
1. Nation ISP. Learning vocabulary in another language: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
2. Webb S, Nation P. How vocabulary is learned: Oxford University Press; 2017.
3. Klimova BF. Games in the Teaching of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;191:1157-60. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.312.
4. Taheri M. The effect of using language games on vocabulary retention of Iranian elementary EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2014;5(3):544. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.3.544-549.
5. Godwin-Jones R. Games in language learning: Opportunities and challenges. Language Learning & Technology. 2014;18(2):9-19. doi: 10.64152/10125/44363.
6. Reinhardt J. Gameful Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.
7. Squire K. Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age: Teachers College Press; 2011.
8. Vandercruysse S, Vandewaetere M, Clarebout G. Game-based learning: A review on the effectiveness of educational games. Handbook of research on serious games as educational, business, and research tools2012. p. 628-47.
9. Ashraf H, Motlagh FG, Salami M. The impact of online games on learning English vocabulary by Iranian (low-intermediate) EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;98:286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.418.
10. Hsieh YH, Lin YC, Hou HT. Exploring elementary-school students' engagement patterns in a game-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2015;18(2):336-48.
11. Chen MH, Tseng WT, Hsiao TY. The effectiveness of digital game‐based vocabulary learning: A framework‐based view of meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2018;49(1):69-77. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12526.
12. Mayer RE. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
13. Reinhardt J, Sykes JM. Digital game and play activity in L2 teaching and learning. Language Learning & Technology. 2014;18(2):2-8. doi: 10.64152/10125/44362.
14. Heydarian Langeroudi E, Khazaee H. Vocabulary Size and Flow Experience: Unexplored Realms of Game-Based Learning in Iranian EFL Programs. International Journal of Research in English Education. 2023;8(3):1-18.
15. Esteban AJ. Theories, Principles, and Game Elements that Support Digital Game- Based Language Learning (DGBLL): A Systematic Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2024;23(3):1-22. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.3.1.
16. Hwang GJ, Chen PY, Chu ST, Chuang WH, Juan CY, Chen HY. Game-Based Language Learning in Technological Contexts: An Integrated Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Online Pedagogy & Course Design. 2023;13(1). doi: 10.4018/IJOPCD.316184.
17. Peterson M. Digital simulation games in CALL: A research review. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2023;36(5-6):943-67. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1954954.
18. Chen HJH, Hsu HL. The impact of a serious game on vocabulary and content learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2020;33(7):811-32. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1593197.
19. Yang L, Li R. Contextualized Game-Based Language Learning: Retrospect and Prospect. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2024;62(1):357-75. doi: 10.1177/07356331231189292.
20. Martins HF. Game on: Notes on Language Learning Potentials Through MMORPGs' Social and Motivational Dynamics. European Journal of Language and Culture Studies. 2023;2(6):1-5. doi: 10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.6.110.
21. Rezi M. Development of Educandy Platform as an Educational Game to Improve Arabic Language Learning Achievement. Journal International Inspire Education Technology. 2023;2(1):53-66. doi: 10.55849/jiiet.v2i1.445.
22. Srivastava A, Rastogi A, Rao A, Shoeb AAM, Abid A, Fisch A, et al. Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and Extrapolating the Capabilities of Language Models. arXiv preprint. 2022;arXiv:2206.04615.
23. Kaivanpanah S, Alavi SM, Ravandpour A. The effect of input-based and output-based tasks with different and identical involvement loads on Iranian EFL learners' incidental vocabulary learning. Cogent Psychology. 2020;7(1):1731223. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2020.1731223.
24. Ng'andu C. Technology Usage in the Teaching of Vocabulary in English in Selected Primary Schools of Kasama District of Zambia. 2024.
25. Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach's alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS. 2018;25(6):85. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.
26. Li X, Kangas M, Zhang J. Comparing the effects of playful pedagogical activities and traditional methods on EFL vocabulary learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning. 2025;15(1). doi: 10.4018/IJGBL.389046.
27. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage; 2017.
28. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
29. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1993.
30. Chowdhury M, Dixon LQ, Kuo LJ, Donaldson JP, Eslami Z, Viruru R, et al. Digital game-based language learning for vocabulary development. Computers and Education Open. 2024;6:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100160.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Parvaneh Pedram (Author); Farhad Fahandezh Saadi; Shahram Afraz (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
