Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perception of Creative Teaching: Understanding the Facilitators, Barriers, and Consequences
Keywords:
barriers, consequences, creative teaching, EFL teachers, facilitators, negotiated performance, teachers’ perceptionAbstract
Creativity is a fundamental property of the 21st-century pedagogical process. Integrating creativity into educational systems despite structural limitations remains a significant concern for educational researchers. This descriptive-qualitative study aimed to investigate Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of creative teaching and to develop a conceptual framework within the constrained environments of English language institutes. Using purposive sampling, 10 male and female EFL teachers from various institutes in Isfahan, Iran, participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach via MAXQDA 2023. The findings were categorized into three dimensions: facilitators (driving forces), inhibitors (structural boundaries), and consequences. Thirteen themes were identified as facilitators, including two-way interaction, continuous monitoring, and creative problem-solving. Primary inhibitors emerged as rigid institutional policies, personal factors, sociocultural aspects, and time constraints. The consequences of creative strategies included enhanced student achievement, motivation, and improved communication. Based on these findings, the study proposes a multidimensional interaction of multiple factors that influence creative teaching within the limited structures of English language institutions, revealing creative teaching as a dynamic navigation between pedagogical innovation and institutional constraints. The findings provide a roadmap for teachers and administrators to transition from mini-c to pro-c creativity within limited institutional structures.
Downloads
References
1. National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education. National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education, 1999.
2. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI. An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development. Human Development. 1991;34(1):1-31. doi: 10.1159/000277029.
3. Boden MA. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. 2 ed: Routledge; 2004.
4. Amabile TM. Creativity in Context: Westview Press; 1996.
5. Amabile TM, Pratt MG. The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2016;36:157-83. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001.
6. Jeffrey B, Craft A. Teaching Creatively and Teaching for Creativity: Distinctions and Relationships. Educational Studies. 2004;30(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/0305569032000159750.
7. Cremin T. Creative Teachers and Creative Teaching. In: Wilson A, editor. Creativity in Primary Education: Learning Matters; 2009. p. 36-46.
8. Lin YS. Fostering Creativity Through Education: A Conceptual Framework of Creative Pedagogy. Creative Education. 2011;2(3):149-55. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.23021.
9. Davies D, Jindal-Snape D, Collier C, Digby R, Hay P, Howe A. Creative Learning Environments in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2013;8:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004.
10. Woods P. Creative Teachers in Primary Schools: Open University Press; 1995.
11. Wang L, Kokotsaki D. Primary School Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in China. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2018;29:115-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.002.
12. Karwowski M, Beghetto RA, Kaufman JC. Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2023. doi: 10.1037/aca0000624.
13. Mercer S, Kostoulas A. Teacher Wellbeing and Resilience in English Language Teaching: A Global Perspective: Routledge; 2024.
14. Henriksen D, Woo K, Mishra P. Creativity and Generative AI in Education: A Shifting Landscape for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning. 2024;8:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s41686-024-00087-1.
15. Zahedi Moghaddam R, Doulikhani L, editors. Developing creative thinking, problem-solving, and teamwork skills through artificial intelligence projects. The Second National Conference on Humanities with a New Approach and the First International Research Conference of Modern Teachers; 2025; Astara.
16. Tao Y, Wang D, Chen G. How does dialogic teaching facilitate students' creative thinking? Evidence from a sequential analysis of teacher-student dialogue in primary language classrooms. British Educational Research Journal. 2025. doi: 10.1002/berj.70031.
17. Hsiao HS, Chen JC, Chen JH, Chen YX, Chung GH. Incorporating the 6E Model Integrated with Creative Thinking Strategies into STEAM Education: Enhancing Children's Fine Motor Skills, Hands-On Performance, and Learning Behaviors. Early Childhood Education Journal. 2025:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10643-025-01981-0.
18. Ball SJ. The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity. Journal of Education Policy. 2003;18(2):215-28. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065.
19. Aliakbari M, Kalantari E. Exploring Iranian EFL Teachers' Perceptions of Creativity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;47:1374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.828.
20. Ghanizadeh A, Jahedizadeh S. EFL Teachers' Teaching Style, Creativity, and Burnout: A Path Analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2016;7(4):666-77. doi: 10.17507/jltr.0704.06.
21. Shahani S, Chalak A, Tabrizi HH. Impact of Critical Thinking Instruction Through Flipped Teaching on Iranian EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension. Journal of Practical Studies in Education. 2022;3(6):33-42. doi: 10.46809/jpse.v3i6.54.
22. Navera GS. Let's Discuss: Second Language Learners Share Ideas - Teacher's Edition2023.
23. Derakhshan A, Greenier V, Fathi J. Exploring the Interplay Between a Loving Pedagogy and EFL Teachers' Creativity. Current Psychology. 2023;42:22350-65. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03310-7.
24. Hong JC, Horng JS, Lin LJ, Chang SH. The Questionnaire Construction of Creative Teaching Factors. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University. 2003;48(1):45-60.
25. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4 ed: Sage Publications; 2015.
26. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4 ed: Sage Publications; 2018.
27. Kaufman JC, Beghetto RA. Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology. 2009;13(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/a0013688.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Seyedeh Nargol Mokhtari (Author); Azizeh Chalak; Hossein Heidari Tabrizi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
