Teachers’ Narrative Accounts of Culturally Responsive Assessment Strategies in Urban Schools

Authors

    Elham Rostampour Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Lorestan, Khorramabad, Iran
    Kourosh Gharavand * Department of Educational Psychology, University of Lorestan, Khorramabad, Iran dr.k.gharavand58@yahoo.com

Keywords:

Culturally responsive assessment, urban education, qualitative research, narrative inquiry, educational equity, teacher reflection, Tehran schools

Abstract

This study explores teachers’ narrative accounts of culturally responsive assessment strategies in urban 
schools, with a focus on understanding the specific practices, challenges, and reflective processes used 
by educators in Tehran. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews 
with 29 teachers from diverse urban schools in Tehran. Participants were purposefully selected to 
represent various subject areas, grade levels, and cultural backgrounds. Interviews were conducted until 
theoretical saturation was achieved, and each session was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data 
were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, to identify recurring 
themes, subthemes, and concepts reflecting teachers’ approaches to culturally responsive assessment.
Teachers reported a wide range of culturally responsive assessment strategies, including integrating 
students’ cultural backgrounds into assessment design, contextualizing tasks, and valuing linguistic 
diversity. Inclusive practices such as building trust, reducing bias, and engaging families were commonly 
cited, along with adaptations for marginalized identities and socioeconomic diversity. Teachers 
emphasized continuous professional learning, self-assessment, and collaboration despite facing systemic 
barriers such as standardized testing pressures and limited resources. Narrative accounts illustrated both 
the promise and challenge of advancing educational equity through assessment in culturally diverse 
urban settings. The study highlights the complex, multifaceted nature of culturally responsive assessment 
in urban schools, emphasizing teachers’ commitment to equity, creativity, and ongoing reflection. 
Effective culturally responsive assessment requires not only individual teacher initiative but also 
supportive professional communities, flexible policy frameworks, and engagement with families and 
communities. Systemic changes and targeted professional development are needed to overcome existing 
barriers and promote sustainable, equitable assessment practices for all students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment in science education: The intersection of theory and practice. Science Education, 95(4),

669–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20436

Ahmadi, M., & Bajelan, A. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of culturally responsive pedagogy in Iranian schools. International Journal of

Educational Development, 89, 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102543

Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.

Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (2019). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (10th ed.). Wiley.

Volume 2, Issue 2

9

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hill, D. (2013). The culturally responsive classroom: Strategies for teachers. Education Canada, 53(3), 10–14.

Jalali, S., & Rezvani, M. (2019). Teachers’ assessment practices and the challenge of cultural diversity in Tehran. Journal of Educational

Research, 23(2), 51–70.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.

https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

Looney, J. (2011). Developing high-quality teachers: Teacher learning, assessment and evaluation. European Journal of Education, 46(4),

440–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01501.x

McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.

Mehran, G. (2017). Diversity and education in Iran: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Comparative Education Review, 61(2), 321–

343. https://doi.org/10.1086/690753

Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment,

grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34.

https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12188

ShayesteFar, M. (2019). Toward culturally responsive teaching in Iranian EFL contexts: Teachers’ attitudes and practices. Asia Pacific

Education Review, 20, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9578-7

Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for culturally responsive assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 319–340.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2

Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

38(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1018

Young, J. W. (2010). Assessment and classroom learning: A review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 151–

167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003747053

Downloads

Published

2024-04-01

Submitted

2024-02-12

Revised

2024-03-16

Accepted

2024-03-29

How to Cite

Rostampour, E., & Gharavand, K. (2024). Teachers’ Narrative Accounts of Culturally Responsive Assessment Strategies in Urban Schools. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 2(2), 1-9. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/44

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.