Teachers’ Narrative Accounts of Culturally Responsive Assessment Strategies in Urban Schools
Keywords:
Culturally responsive assessment, urban education, qualitative research, narrative inquiry, educational equity, teacher reflection, Tehran schoolsAbstract
This study explores teachers’ narrative accounts of culturally responsive assessment strategies in urban
schools, with a focus on understanding the specific practices, challenges, and reflective processes used
by educators in Tehran. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews
with 29 teachers from diverse urban schools in Tehran. Participants were purposefully selected to
represent various subject areas, grade levels, and cultural backgrounds. Interviews were conducted until
theoretical saturation was achieved, and each session was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data
were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, to identify recurring
themes, subthemes, and concepts reflecting teachers’ approaches to culturally responsive assessment.
Teachers reported a wide range of culturally responsive assessment strategies, including integrating
students’ cultural backgrounds into assessment design, contextualizing tasks, and valuing linguistic
diversity. Inclusive practices such as building trust, reducing bias, and engaging families were commonly
cited, along with adaptations for marginalized identities and socioeconomic diversity. Teachers
emphasized continuous professional learning, self-assessment, and collaboration despite facing systemic
barriers such as standardized testing pressures and limited resources. Narrative accounts illustrated both
the promise and challenge of advancing educational equity through assessment in culturally diverse
urban settings. The study highlights the complex, multifaceted nature of culturally responsive assessment
in urban schools, emphasizing teachers’ commitment to equity, creativity, and ongoing reflection.
Effective culturally responsive assessment requires not only individual teacher initiative but also
supportive professional communities, flexible policy frameworks, and engagement with families and
communities. Systemic changes and targeted professional development are needed to overcome existing
barriers and promote sustainable, equitable assessment practices for all students.
Downloads
References
Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment in science education: The intersection of theory and practice. Science Education, 95(4),
669–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20436
Ahmadi, M., & Bajelan, A. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of culturally responsive pedagogy in Iranian schools. International Journal of
Educational Development, 89, 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102543
Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.
Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (2019). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (10th ed.). Wiley.
Volume 2, Issue 2
9
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hill, D. (2013). The culturally responsive classroom: Strategies for teachers. Education Canada, 53(3), 10–14.
Jalali, S., & Rezvani, M. (2019). Teachers’ assessment practices and the challenge of cultural diversity in Tehran. Journal of Educational
Research, 23(2), 51–70.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.
https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
Looney, J. (2011). Developing high-quality teachers: Teacher learning, assessment and evaluation. European Journal of Education, 46(4),
440–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01501.x
McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.
Mehran, G. (2017). Diversity and education in Iran: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Comparative Education Review, 61(2), 321–
343. https://doi.org/10.1086/690753
Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment,
grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34.
https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12188
ShayesteFar, M. (2019). Toward culturally responsive teaching in Iranian EFL contexts: Teachers’ attitudes and practices. Asia Pacific
Education Review, 20, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9578-7
Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for culturally responsive assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 319–340.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2
Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
38(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1018
Young, J. W. (2010). Assessment and classroom learning: A review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 151–
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.