Identifying Effective Metrics in Instructor–Student Interaction in Virtual Education

Authors

    Fatemeh Hejazian Department of Educational Management, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
    Negin Jabbary * Department of Educational Management, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran neginjabbary@iau.ac.ir
    Taraneh Enayati Department of Educational Management, Sar.C., Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

Keywords:

Virtual education, instructor–student interaction, indigenous model, validation

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating an indigenous and comprehensive model for virtual education, focusing on identifying and strengthening effective interaction between instructors and students in Iranian universities. The research was implemented using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative phase, employing a phenomenological method and interviews with 12 experts, the dimensions and components of the initial model were extracted. In the quantitative phase, the proposed model was tested using a researcher-developed questionnaire (89 items) and a sample of 379 students from universities in Golestan Province. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in PLS and SPSS software. The findings led to the design and validation of a six-dimensional model that explains effective interaction based on educational, communicative, emotional-psychological, and technological dimensions. The components of “active student participation” and “quality of instructor feedback” were identified as the strongest indicators of interaction. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed good model fit and significant path coefficients (all above 0.79). The proposed model provides a systematic and indigenous framework for understanding and improving interaction in virtual education in Iran. This model indicates that achieving high-quality interaction requires moving beyond a one-way information transmission paradigm toward activating instructional design, sustained bidirectional communication, and simultaneous attention to emotional and technical dimensions. Application of this model can serve as a basis for developing practical strategies for instructors, instructional designers, and policymakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ziai N, Hamzehpour R, BagherTabar M, Alidadi S, Ghaemi Amiri M. Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Virtual Education at the Self-Financed Campus of Babol University of Medical Sciences During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Medical Education. 2021;9(2):62-72. doi: 10.22088/mededj.9.2.62.

2. Lee J, Kim H, Kron F. Virtual education strategies in the context of sustainable health care and medical education: A topic modelling analysis of four decades of research. Medical Education. 2024;58(1):47-62. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1821188.

3. Xue E, Li J, Xu L. Online education action for defeating COVID-19 in China: An analysis of the system, mechanism and mode. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2022;54(6):799-811. doi: 10.1111/medu.15202.

4. Rezaei M, Khashai A, Ramazani Q. Investigating the Effectiveness of Virtual Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspectives of Faculty Members and Students at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Scientific Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2025;27(Special Issue):1-10. doi: 10.22088/JBUMS.27.SUPPLEMENT_1,MEDICAL_EDUCATION,.3.

5. Abili K, Mazari E. Proposing a Self-Development Heutagogical Model in an Electronic Context (A Model for Learning Leadership). Digital Transformation Journal. 2021;2(1):1-17. doi: 10.22034/dtj.2021.293786.1016.

6. Mohammadi M, Gholam Pour M. Synthesizing Heutagogical Approaches for Optimal Use of Academic Textbooks in Blended Learning Environments. Research and Writing of Academic Books. 2025:e730115. doi: 10.30487/rwab.2025.2065562.1656.

7. Fu Z. A Contrastive Study of Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Spanish Classrooms Between Chinese and Spanish Universities-An Empirical Analysis Based on the University of Alcalá and Fujian Normal University. The Educational Review, USA. 2025;9(4). doi: 10.1080/11356405.2016.1237339.

8. Shahvardi R, Rezaei Zadeh M, Vahidi Asl M. Methods and Tools for Creating Effective Interactions Between Instructors and Students in Virtual Classes. Journal of Educational Technology. 2023;17(3):487-506. doi: 20.1001.1.17351901.1393.15.4.6.9.

9. Goldasteh A, Homayoun Arya S, Ghafouri F. Proposing a Model for Improving the Quality of Interaction Between Instructors and Students in Virtual University Education Systems. Journal of Educational Planning Studies. 2023;12(24):72-91. doi: 10.22080/eps.2024.24160.2137.

10. Mohammadi Mehr M, Haji J. An Exploration of Instructor-Student Interactions. In 8th Scientific Research Conference on the Development and Promotion of Educational Sciences and Psychology in Iran. 2022. doi: 10.22034/ethic.2024.2040206.1117.

11. Deh Bashi R. The Harms of Cyber Interactions Among Students. Jaliz Publications. 2025. doi: 10.33592/rmegums.17.2.22.

12. Dubiel A, Kamińska D, Zwoliński G, Ramić-Brkić B, Agostini D, Zancanaro M. Virtual reality for the training of soft skills for professional education: trends and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. 2025:1-21. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2450634.

13. Yocham W, Merinboer Jv, Cooper R. A Comprehensive Electronic Learning System: Educational, Technical, and Organizational Requirements: Tehran: SAMT Organization; 2023.

14. Velayati P, Delpasand K, Dadgaran I, Rahbar Taramsari M, Babaei Hemmati Y. Attitudes of Faculty and Students in the Dental School Regarding Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Virtual Education at Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2025;17(2):22-34. doi: 10.32592/rmegums.17.2.22.

15. Safari M, Shayestefar M, Alaei S. Examining the Preferred Approaches of Paramedical Students at Semnan University of Medical Sciences Regarding Virtual Education (2021-2022). Journal of Education and Ethics in Nursing. 2025;14(1 & 2):22-30. doi: 10.22034/ethic.2024.2040206.1117.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2025-10-21

Revised

2026-02-01

Accepted

2026-02-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hejazian, F., Jabbary, N., & Enayati, T. (2026). Identifying Effective Metrics in Instructor–Student Interaction in Virtual Education. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1-12. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/221

Similar Articles

1-10 of 184

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.