Identification of Challenges in Integrating Physical Education and Religious Education Curricula
Keywords:
Curriculum Integration, Physical Education, Religious Education, Interdisciplinary Curriculum, Grounded Theory, Educational ChallengesAbstract
The present study aimed to identify and explain the challenges associated with integrating physical education and religious education curricula from the perspectives of educational experts and practitioners. This study was conducted using a qualitative research design within an interpretivist paradigm, employing grounded theory as the main methodological approach. The research population consisted of experts and teachers with experience in curriculum planning, physical education, and religious education. Participants were selected through purposive and theoretical sampling, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were gathered using in-depth semi-structured interviews and analysis of relevant documents. The data analysis process was carried out simultaneously with data collection and followed the systematic procedures of grounded theory, including open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Constant comparative analysis was used to refine categories and develop a coherent theoretical framework. To ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings, strategies such as member checking, peer review, prolonged engagement, and maintaining an audit trail were applied. The results of the study indicated that the challenges of integrating physical education and religious education curricula can be categorized into four main domains: cultural challenges, content-related challenges, administrative and structural challenges, and methodological challenges. Cultural challenges were identified as the most influential, reflecting deep-rooted attitudinal barriers and resistance to interdisciplinary approaches. Content-related challenges revealed significant issues in resource availability, content organization, balance, and clarity, indicating weaknesses in curriculum design. Administrative and structural challenges highlighted systemic constraints such as centralized curriculum systems, lack of institutional support, and insufficient funding. Methodological challenges pointed to gaps in teaching strategies, lack of appropriate tools, insufficient teacher preparedness, and weak alignment with learners’ needs and real-world contexts. Overall, the findings suggest that these challenges are interrelated and collectively hinder the effective implementation of integrated curricula. The study concludes that successful integration of physical education and religious education curricula requires addressing multidimensional challenges that span cultural, structural, content-related, and methodological domains, and emphasizes the need for systemic reform, enhanced teacher competencies, and context-sensitive curriculum design to achieve meaningful and sustainable integration.
Downloads
References
1. Swist T, Markauskaitė L, Mosely G, Wrigley C. Approaches to Strengthening Teachers' Interdisciplinary Expertise: From Configurative Review to Design Patterns. Review of Education. 2025;13(3). doi: 10.1002/rev3.70113.
2. Sugiarto E, Husain AH, Rohidi TR. How Is Interdisciplinary Study in Arts Education Conducted? Epistemological Reflections Towards Postgraduate Students' Research. European Journal of Education. 2025;60(3). doi: 10.1111/ejed.70183.
3. Darbellay F. Interdisciplinarity, Team Science, and the Next Generation of Researchers: The Children’s Drawings of Gods Project Experience. 2023:489-500. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94429-2_19.
4. Schroeder MJ. Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Transdisciplinarity: The Tower of Babel in the Age of Two Cultures. Philosophies. 2022;7(2):26. doi: 10.3390/philosophies7020026.
5. Guo X, Li Z. Exploring the Significance and Path of Interdisciplinary Integration of Art Education in Primary and Secondary Schools in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. 2023;7(12):326-33. doi: 10.26689/jcer.v7i12.5840.
6. Liu Q. Interdisciplinary Integration in Physical Education Curriculum Design and Implementation: A Study on the Role and Strategies. The Educational Review Usa. 2023;7(10):1514-20. doi: 10.26855/er.2023.10.010.
7. Tan C. Research on the Path of Sports Sociology Curriculum From the Interdisciplinary Perspective. Mobile Information Systems. 2022;2022:1-8. doi: 10.1155/2022/3415257.
8. Hall T. Amplifying Religious Literacy Education Through the Frameworks of Global Competence. 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202408.0563.v3.
9. Khalili S, Kallioniemi A, Noaparast KB. Characteristics of Human Agency in Liberal and Islamic Religious Education Based on the National Core Curricula of Finland and Iran. British Journal of Religious Education. 2021;44(1):53-65. doi: 10.1080/01416200.2021.1874874.
10. Sjöström J, Economou C, Edström A-M, Ekberg J-E, Källberg PS, Larneby M, et al. Knowledge Contributions From Different School Subjects to Cross-Curricular Didactics for Bildung and Sustainability. 2024. doi: 10.23988/sats.1009.c1402.
11. Balbuena SE. Socionatural Balance in Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4777831.
12. Zhang H, Qian ZC. The Interplay of Religion and the Visual Arts: A Bibliometric Network Analysis (1991–2023). Religions. 2024;15(4):481. doi: 10.3390/rel15040481.
13. Barnes MR, Campagna IA, Haddad B, Watkins E. Unearthing Green Potential: Assessing the State of Managed Urban Landscape Curricula in Minnesota's Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education. 2024;53(1). doi: 10.1002/nse2.20139.
14. Batat W. Holixec Education: From Atomistic and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Holixec Intelligence (HI) for Human-Centric Leadership in the Phygital Age. Journal of Macromarketing. 2025;45(3):528-41. doi: 10.1177/02761467251350356.
15. Woolley M, Bowie R, Hulbert S, Thomas C, Riordan JP, Revell L. Teachers' Perspectives on the Relationship Between Secondary School Departments of Science and Religious Education: Independence or Mutual Enrichment? The Curriculum Journal. 2023;35(3):378-95. doi: 10.1002/curj.233.
16. Torres AC, Paiva J, Mouraz A. High School Students’ Questions About Science and Religion in School Debates With Scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 2021;17(6):em1967. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/10864.
17. Mirbahai L, Noordali F, Nolan HA. Designing an Interdisciplinary Health Course: a Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Students’ Experience of Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design and Learning Experiences. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2024;11. doi: 10.1177/23821205241260488.
18. Priestley M, Philippou S. Bittersweet Endings and New Beginnings: Another Cycle of Experience as Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal. 2024;35(3):331-6. doi: 10.1002/curj.284.
19. Sutter R. Professional Identify Formation: History, Practice and Challenges. 2024. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/n8huc.
20. Fa C, Yang F, Shi X-G, Xiang Z, Zhang RR, Wang L-Q, et al. Design a Voluntary Cooperative Network Research in End‐of‐Life Care. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 2025;66(2):188-97. doi: 10.1111/apv.70004.
21. Tornini VA, Politi SP, Bruce L, Latham SR. Maximizing Biomedical Research Impacts Through Bioethical Considerations. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2023;16(4). doi: 10.1242/dmm.050046.
22. Salamah N. Curriculum Management to Shape Students' Competence in Knowledge, Religious Values, and Morals. Journal of Education and Learning Innovation. 2025;2(1):1-15. doi: 10.59373/jelin.v2i1.90.
23. Suparta S. Religious Moderation-Based Curriculum for Urban Muslims: A Study in Islamic University of Indonesia Islamic Boarding School. Akademika Jurnal Pemikiran Islam. 2024;29(1):1. doi: 10.32332/akademika.v29i1.8732.
24. Anum A, Saleh K, Nasor N, Murtafiah NH, Apriyanto S. Problems and Implementation of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies. Scaffolding Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme. 2022;4(2):483-98. doi: 10.37680/scaffolding.v4i2.1666.
25. Muhsan M, Haris A. Multidisciplinary Approach in Islamic Religious Education: the Formation of a Holistic and Responsive Muslim Community to the Dynamics of Modern Life. Qalamuna Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Agama. 2022;14(1):597-612. doi: 10.37680/qalamuna.v14i1.4440.
26. Xu S, Anderson CB, Lew C. Minding the Gap: Bibliometric Equity in Theology and Religious Studies. Information Services & Use. 2023;43(3-4):275-84. doi: 10.3233/isu-230211.
27. Wang W. Research on Ideological and Political Education in Universities Under the "Simultaneous Development of Five Aspects" Student Management Model. Adult and Higher Education. 2023;5(17). doi: 10.23977/aduhe.2023.051713.
28. Нікітченко Л, Davydova Z, Krylova V, Samborska O, Arkushyna H. Innovative Approaches to Learning and Teaching in Ukrainian Higher Education. Cadernos De Educação Tecnologia E Sociedade. 2024;17(1):495-505. doi: 10.14571/brajets.v17.n1.495-505.
29. Stanton M. Thematic Changes in Religious Studies Research. Anztla Ejournal. 2024(31-32):22-5. doi: 10.31046/anztla.i31-32.3485.
30. Rezaie MMH, Abbaspour A, Khosravi M. Designing and Validating of Religious Education Curriculum Model in Primary Education. Curriculum Planning. 2021;18(69):29-49.
31. Soltan Ahmadi ZA, Kayhan J, Maleki Avarsin S, Yari J. Designing an Ideal Curriculum Model for Religious Education in Preschool. Journal of Applied Issues in Islamic Education. 2021;6(18):7-30. doi: 10.52547/qaiie.6.1.7.
32. Tahmasebzadeh Sheikhlari D, Jalilzadeh M. Explaining the Components of Spiritual Education in Religious (Qur'anic) and Non-Religious (Secularism) Teachings and Its Alignment with Macro-Level Curriculum Documents. Research in Islamic Education Issues. 2021;22(50):231-77.
33. Khandani AA, Imanzadeh A, Ranjdoust S. Development of an Optimal Model for Ecological Citizen Curriculum of Junior High School. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education. 2023;19(1):117-38. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2021.37965.3431.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Radmehr (Author); Mohsen Talebzadeh Nobrian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.