Designing an In-Service Training Model for Teachers in the Iranian Education System

Authors

    Vahid Yaghmori PhD Student, Department of Educational Sciences, Za.C., Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
    Nooraldin Mirzaei * Department of Educational Sciences, Za.C., Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran nooraldin.mirzaei@iau.ac.ir
    Mohammad Mojtabazadeh Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Design, Grounded theory, Iran, In-service teacher training, Model

Abstract

This study aimed to design a comprehensive in-service teacher training model for the Iranian education system to identify the key dimensions, components, and operational pathways for effective professional development. This qualitative research employed a grounded theory approach. Data were collected through 21 semi-structured interviews with teachers, school administrators, and educational experts, as well as an analysis of in-service training program documents. The data were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding to extract major categories and design the theoretical model. Findings: The results indicated that the in-service teacher training model functions as an integrated, five-dimensional system: causal/antecedent conditions (intelligent professional needs assessment), contextual/background conditions (learner-oriented organizational support and educational digital inclusion), intervening conditions (smart digital learning and educational artificial intelligence literacy), strategic/interactive conditions (advanced pedagogical design and innovative intelligent methods), and consequential conditions (sustainable professional development, intelligent educational evaluation, and networked professional participation). The central axis of the model, “Intelligent Management of In-Service Training,” integrates all dimensions into a coherent and interactive framework, enhancing training effectiveness, teacher engagement, and organizational learning. The findings confirmed the central role of “Intelligent Management of In-Service Training” as the final conceptual framework. This five-dimensional model, tailored to the Iranian context, provides a practical, evidence-based tool for planning, implementing, and evaluating in-service training, offering scientific guidance for policymakers, administrators, and future research in teachers’ professional development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Altan MZ. The need for more effective in-service training for professional development of English language teachers. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science. 2016;15(2):1-12. doi: 10.9734/BJESBS/2016/24594.

2. Mwakabenga RJ. Sustainable In-Service Teacher Training Programmes in Tanzania: Harnessing Mentorship for Continued Professional Learning. Papers in Education and Development. 2025;1(aop):1-22. doi: 10.1163/26650746-20250005.

3. Phiri D, Haambokoma NM, Kalinde B, Phiri-Nalube P, Muleya G. Transformative pedagogies and practices: The potential of the school-based in-service teacher training (SITT) model in transforming teaching and learning in Zambia. Journal of the Educational Research Association of Zambia. 2023;1(1):60-85.

4. Mansouri S, Moradi R. Teachers' lived experiences of in-service training: A phenomenological study. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. 2023;9(16):51-82. doi: 10.48310/ITT.2023.3136.

5. Habibi Azar A, Keyhan J, Talebi B. A phenomenology of teachers' lived experiences regarding challenges in in-service training programs. Educational Technology. 2021;15(4):743-56. doi: 10.22061/TEJ.2021.7507.2546.

6. Abbasi Kasani H, Mas-haf N, Sa'dollah M, Javadi-Nia S. Evaluating the effectiveness of in-service teacher training programs in culture and art courses of secondary schools in Alborz Province based on CIPP model. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. 2025;11(19):67-81. doi: 10.48310/itt.2025.16322.931.

7. Aghili SH, Ahmadi Haji OB. Short-term in-service training courses: A CIPP-based diagnostic study with AI-based solutions within educational planning. Educational Planning Studies. 2024;13(26):150-71. doi: 10.22080/eps.2025.28107.2293.

8. Ahmadi H, Nosrati K, Jalali Z, Ebrahimi Tabar AH. Identifying factors of teachers' low motivation in attending in-service training programs. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. 2025:In press. doi: 10.48310/itt.2025.20983.1207.

9. Matović S. Effectiveness of in-service teacher training for developing necessary digital competencies in modern education. Istraživanja u pedagogiji. 2025;15(2):408-18. doi: 10.5937/IstrPed2502408M.

10. Dortaj Y, Mashayekh P, Ghasemi Zade A, Moatamed HR. Designing an in-service teacher training model based on cloud computing: Case study of Bushehr Province. Rahyafti No in Educational Management. 2025;15(5):49-65. doi: 10.30495/jedu.2024.31845.6389.

11. Kohnke L. AI's transformative impact on teacher education: Enhancing in-service and pre-service training. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2025. p. 596-608.

12. Lee YJ, Davis RO, Ryu J. Korean in-service teachers' perceptions of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) education for teaching in schools and their AI teacher training programs. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2024;14(2):214-9. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2042.

13. Puripunyavanich M. Measuring the effectiveness of an online teacher training program for in-service secondary school teachers: Trainees' reactions and learning. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 2025;18(1):816-57. doi: 10.70730/YVSD7249.

14. Bhardwaj K, Rathee N. MOOC-based in-service training for the professional development of teachers in India. Indian Journal of Educational Technology. 2024;6(II):305-17.

15. Damianidou E. Obligatory professional training for in-service teachers: worthy time or a waste of time? European Journal of Teacher Education. 2024;47(1):23-40. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2021.1961734.

16. Asiegbu EC, Sinebe E. Assessment of the implementation of in-service training policy for teachers in primary and secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. Unizik Journal of Educational Management and Policy. 2024;6(3):77-83.

17. Gonzales J, Cawaling A, Felipe R, Ojano C, Quitlong R, Bumaya E, et al. In-service training: Its effects on the professional growth and development of elementary teachers. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2024;26(6):571-80. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13929471.

18. Maunula M, Harju-Luukkainen H. Enhancing teacher well-being through in-service training: A study on the impact of the Teacher Classroom Management (TCM) method. A Nordic perspective on teacher well-being in educational contexts (1st ed): Routledge; 2026. p. 18.

19. Abbala J, Juma S. In-service training for improving the quality of English language teaching in Zanzibar's secondary schools. Quality Assurance in Education. 2024;32(3):371-86. doi: 10.1108/QAE-12-2023-0211.

20. Tarafi J, Nateghi F, Jalalvandi M. Providing an optimal model for in-service teacher training programs with pedagogical, andragogical, and heutagogical approaches. Curriculum and Instructional Planning Research. 2020;10(2):1-30. doi: https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jcdepr/Article/1081997.

21. Tuncel ZA, Çobanoğlu F. In-service teacher training: Problems of the teachers as learners. International Journal of Instruction. 2018;11(4):159-74. doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11411a.

22. Rashidi Z, Nili M, Zarei-Zavarkhi E, Delavar A. Designing and validating a dynamic computer-based scaffolding model in virtual in-service teacher training. Human Resource Development and Training. 2022;34(9):101-36. doi: 10.1001.1.24233277.1401.9.34.8.5.

23. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: Sage; 2014.

24. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.): Sage Publications; 2014.

25. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.): Sage; 2015.

26. Hooman H. Practical guide to qualitative research: SAMT; 2024.

27. Teo T, Khine MS. Structural equation modeling in educational research: Concepts and applications2009.

28. Radhakrishnan G. Sampling in mixed methods research. International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management. 2014;2(1):24-7.

29. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: A practical guide: SAGE Publications; 2021.

30. Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 2009;9(2):27-40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027.

31. Hosseini Largani SM, Mojtabazadeh M. Design and validation of a quality education model for universities in Iran. Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 2021;14(2):221-58. doi: 10.52547/MPES.14.2.221.

32. O'Reilly K. The power, scope and flexibility of grounded theory research for business. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2021. p. 82-97.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2025-10-29

Revised

2026-02-17

Accepted

2026-02-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yaghmori, V. ., Mirzaei, N., & Mojtabazadeh, M. . (2026). Designing an In-Service Training Model for Teachers in the Iranian Education System. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1-13. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/235

Similar Articles

11-20 of 195

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.