Validation of the Model of Ethical Requirements of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords:
Model validation, ethical requirements, Artificial Intelligence, educationAbstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of validating a model of the ethical requirements of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. In terms of purpose, the research was applied; in terms of data type, it employed an exploratory mixed-methods design; and in terms of implementation, it was carried out using a paradigmatic grounded theory approach in the qualitative phase and a cross-sectional survey method in the quantitative phase. The qualitative participants consisted of experts and specialists in the fields of artificial intelligence and information technology in education, including university faculty members and thematic administrators within the education system. The sample was selected purposively using the snowball sampling method, and interviews were conducted with 23 participants until theoretical saturation was achieved. The quantitative population included all district and secondary school administrators in the city of Tehran, totaling 1,880 individuals. Based on Cochran’s formula, a sample size of 319 was determined and selected through stratified random sampling. Qualitative data were collected through fieldwork using semi-structured interviews, while quantitative data were gathered through fieldwork using a researcher-developed questionnaire. To establish the trustworthiness of the qualitative findings, triangulation methods—including dependability, credibility, confirmability, and transferability—were employed, indicating that the data possessed adequate validity. The validity of the quantitative instrument was assessed through face validity followed by content validity, with the content validity ratio (CVR) for each component exceeding 0.42. The reliability of the instrument was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha, with coefficients for all components exceeding 0.70. Qualitative data were analyzed using theoretical coding, and quantitative data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicated that the model of ethical requirements of artificial intelligence in education comprised 22 axial codes and 100 open codes within six dimensions of the paradigmatic model, all of which were confirmed by experts in the qualitative phase. According to the findings, the core phenomenon of ethical requirements of AI in education included three axial codes and 13 open codes; the causal conditions comprised three axial codes and 15 open codes; the contextual conditions included three axial codes and 16 open codes; the intervening conditions consisted of three axial codes and 14 open codes; the strategies encompassed five axial codes and 23 open codes; and the consequences included five axial codes and 19 open codes. Finally, the developed model was evaluated in the quantitative phase through confirmatory factor analysis, and the model fit indices indicated confirmation of the model. By accurately identifying conditions, strategies, and consequences, the proposed model provides a realistic yet normative representation of AI ethics in education.
Downloads
References
1. Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
2. Holmes W, Bialik M, Fadel C. Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. 2022. doi: 10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068.
3. Selwyn N. Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education: Polity Press; 2019.
4. Mittelstadt B. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2023;5(9):895-8.
5. Williamson B, Piattoeva N. Objectivity as standardization in data-scientific education governance. Learning, Media and Technology. 2023;48(2):137-50.
6. Williamson B. Education, technology and data politics: The digital transformation of schooling: Routledge; 2023.
7. Unesco. Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO Publishing, 2021.
8. Oecd. AI and the future of education. OECD Publishing, 2021.
9. Holmes W, Tuomi I. State-of-the-art and gaps in AI ethics in education. AI and Ethics. 2023;3(2):387-400.
10. Rensfeldt AB, Rahm L. Teachers' perspectives on ethical issues of artificial intelligence in education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2022;115:103703.
11. Janssen M, Kuk G. The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in public sector decision-making. Government Information Quarterly. 2022;39(1):101622.
12. Amiri N, Ketabi S, Hossein Vand F, Papi M, editors. Digital Citizenship Education in Smart Schools with an Emphasis on Digital Ethics. The First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education and Training, Psychology, Educational Sciences, and Religious, Cultural, Social, and Management Studies in the Third Millennium; 2025; Bushehr.
13. Chidinma AE, Yinka KR. Undergraduate Students' Perception of Artificial Intelligence for Enhancing Educational Practices: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations. Global Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2025;11(1):30-41. doi: 10.55284/gjss.v11i1.1411.
14. Nwokocha S, Kennedy O, Yakpir G, Olori E, Nchindia C, Kachitsa C, et al. Commentary: artificial intelligence and the future of higher education—towards inclusive, ethical, and employability-driven learning ecosystems. Critique Open Research & Review. 2025;3(2):18-29. doi: 10.55640/corr-v03i02-04.
15. Kizilcec RF, Lee H. Algorithmic fairness in education. AI & Society. 2022;37(2):779-94.
16. Yu L, Yu Z. Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Artificial Intelligence Ethics in Education Using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061778.
17. Chen H. The Ethical Challenges of Educational Artificial Intelligence and Coping Measures: A Discussion in the Context of the 2024 World Digital Education Conference. Science Insights Education Frontiers. 2024;20(2):3263-81. doi: 10.15354/sief.24.re339.
18. KarakuŞ N, Gedik K, Kazazoğlu S. Ethical Decision-Making in Education: A Comparative Study of Teachers and Artificial Intelligence in Ethical Dilemmas. Behavioral Sciences. 2025;15(4):469. doi: 10.3390/bs15040469.
19. Zhang DQW. Goal Progression, Trait Changes, and Practice Paths of Artificial Intelligence Ethics Education of Professional Courses in Higher Education. Jes. 2024;20(2):2151-60. doi: 10.52783/jes.1665.
20. Love AS. Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Education: Navigating Ethical Challenges and Empowering the Next Generation of Professionals. Health Promotion Practice. 2025. doi: 10.1177/15248399251320989.
21. Smyrnaiou Z. Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence and New Technologies in Education 5.0. Jaimld. 2023;1(4):119-24. doi: 10.51219/jaimld/anastasios-liapakis/15.
22. Al-Zahrani AM, Alasmari TM. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4.
23. Gupta S, Sharma P, Vajrala KR, Fatima A, Sharma N. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Education: Advancing Personalized Learning Within Ethical Frameworks: An Overview. EthAIca. 2025;4:418. doi: 10.56294/ai2025418.
24. Chen Z, Wenhao Z. Ethical Shifts and Innovative Approaches to Civic Education Under Generative Artificial Intelligence. 2024:181-7. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-263-7_25.
25. Hadi MH, Jasim AA. Legislative and Ethical Foundations for Future Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the College of Basic Education. 2024;30(126):127-45. doi: 10.35950/cbej.v30i126.12231.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad motahari Nejad, Maryam Afzal Khani, Narges Shariat Madari (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.