Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and In-Person English Language Instruction on Students’ Speaking Proficiency

Authors

    Alireza Sohrabi * Assistant Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, NT.C., Tehran, Iran Sohrabitefl@iau.ac.ir
    Bita Hassanpour Faculty of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, NT.C., Tehran, Iran
    Arshia Jafari Saleh Faculty of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, NT.C., Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Online learning, In-person instruction, Speaking proficiency, English as a Foreign Language (EFL), Qualitative research, Learner perceptions, Hybrid pedagogy

Abstract

This study aimed to explore and compare how learners perceive the effectiveness of online and in-person English language instruction in developing their speaking proficiency, focusing on their experiences, challenges, and perceived progress in each modality. A qualitative research design was employed to capture in-depth insights into learners’ experiences. Nineteen English language learners (10 females, 9 males; aged 18–32) from private language institutes in Tehran, Iran, participated in the study. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure variation in gender, proficiency level, and learning mode. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews that explored learners’ perceptions of instructional effectiveness, interaction quality, feedback, motivation, and confidence in speaking. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis with NVivo 14 software. The coding process continued until theoretical saturation was reached, resulting in the emergence of four main themes and multiple subthemes. Analysis revealed that both online and in-person instruction contributed to speaking proficiency through distinct mechanisms. In-person classes enhanced fluency, pronunciation, and pragmatic competence through immediate feedback, peer interaction, and teacher presence. Online instruction promoted learner autonomy, reflective practice, and pronunciation monitoring through digital tools such as speech recognition and recorded feedback. Teacher support, engagement strategies, and feedback modality significantly influenced learners’ motivation and willingness to communicate. Despite technological challenges, participants appreciated the flexibility and self-paced nature of online learning, while many expressed a preference for hybrid models that integrate both approaches for optimal results. Both online and in-person English instruction are effective for improving speaking proficiency when pedagogical design, feedback mechanisms, and learner engagement are appropriately balanced. Integrating the social richness of classroom interaction with the flexibility of digital tools can create a more holistic and learner-centered model for developing oral competence in EFL contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Submitted

2025-08-02

Revised

2025-10-23

Accepted

2025-11-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sohrabi, A., Hassanpour , B., & Jafari Saleh, A. (2026). Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and In-Person English Language Instruction on Students’ Speaking Proficiency. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1-13. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/150

Similar Articles

21-30 of 118

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.