Vocabulary Exercises and Reading Comprehension: Evidence from Iranian ESP Learners at the Undergraduate Level
Keywords:
reading comprehension, vocabulary exercises, learners, ESP testAbstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between vocabulary exercises and reading comprehension among Iranian ESP learners. The research method employed was a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design. The research population consisted of 40 Iranian ESP undergraduate learners of accounting who were selected through the administration of the Oxford Placement Test (OPT) and participated in the experiment of this study. They were divided into experimental and comparison groups and underwent a reading comprehension pre-test. Subsequently, the experimental group received five sessions of vocabulary exercises. Finally, a post-test was administered to both groups. Data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test between post-tests, and a paired samples t-test was employed to demonstrate the possible improvement of the groups. The results indicated superior performance of the experimental group, which obtained higher scores in the reading comprehension post-test after five sessions. The analysis of the learners’ reading comprehension performance, which was independently compared between the pre-test and post-test of the experimental and control groups, revealed that participants with a degree of knowledge in vocabulary exercises reflected more successful performance in their ESP reading comprehension test. This may suggest that teaching vocabulary exercises can assist them in improving their reading comprehension activities.
Downloads
References
1. Koda K. Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
2. Hulstijn JH, Laufer B. Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning. 2001;51(3):539-58. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00164.
3. Sidek HM, Rahim HA. The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;197:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046.
4. Al Qunayeer HS. An investigation of the relationship between reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and English language proficiency level of Saudi EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 2021;12(2):59-69. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.2.p.59.
5. Zeng Y, Lu Q, Wallace MP, Guo Y, Fan CW, Chen X. Understanding sustainable development of English vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from Chinese EFL learners. Sustainability. 2022;14(11):6532. doi: 10.3390/su14116532.
6. Heidari-Shahreza MA, Tavakoli M. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. The Language Learning Journal. 2016;44(1):17-32. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2012.708051.
7. Soltani Moghaddam M, Kaivanpanah S. Examining the role of task-induced involvement in L2 lexical inferencing. Journal of Foreign Language Research. 2015;5(1):87-110. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2015.62513.
8. Chen C, Truscott J. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics. 2010;31(5):693-713. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq031.
9. Alharbi M, Ismail N. Strategy efficacy in technical vocabulary learning: A comparison of form-based and meaning-based approaches. English for Specific Purposes. 2024;73:45-58.
10. Altalhab S. The vocabulary knowledge of Saudi EFL tertiary students. English Language Teaching. 2019;12(5):55-65. doi: 10.5539/elt.v12n5p55.
11. Al-Khasawneh FMS. The impact of vocabulary knowledge on the reading comprehension of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Education. 2019;5(3):24-34. doi: 10.17323/jle.2019.8822.
12. Shirazizadeh M. The role of vocabulary and syntax in EFL reading comprehension among Iranian graduate students: Evaluation of two causal models. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research). 2020;12(36):363-84. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2020.25642.1689.
13. Nouri N, Rahimy R, Mashhadi Heidar D. Grammatical sensitivity task and reading comprehension: Evidence from Iranian undergraduate ESP learners. Journal of Foreign Language Research. 2023;13(1):93-108. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2023.346642.977.
14. Heidari-Shahreza MA. The effect of L1-L2 lexicalization mismatch on the incidental acquisition of receptive vocabulary knowledge. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences. 2014;28:67-76. doi: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.39.67.
15. Liu PD, McBride-Chang C. What is morphological awareness? Tapping lexical compounding awareness in Chinese third graders. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2010;102(1):62-73. doi: 10.1037/a0016933.
16. Moghadam SH, Zainal Z, Ghaderpour M. A review on the important role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;66:555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.300.
17. Kalantari R, Saidi M. The effect of "assignment-oriented" teaching method on students' understanding. Education and Evaluation (Educational Sciences). 2009;2(6):175-87.
18. Al-Jarrah H, Ismail NS. Reading comprehension difficulties among EFL learners in higher learning institutions. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2018;8(4):32-41. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v8n4p32.
19. Zarei AA, Shirmohammadi H. Lexical inference strategies affecting the construction and understanding of English language terms. Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages. 2019;9(2):515-38.
20. Oz H. Ideal L2 self as a predictor of intercultural communicative competence. The Anthropologist. 2015;19(1):41-53. doi: 10.1080/09720073.2015.11891637.
21. Abtahi SM, Khodadadian M. The effect of vocabulary knowledge and prior knowledge on non-Iranian Persian learners' reading comprehension. Linguistics (Humanities). 2018;10(28):195-217.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Narges Noori (Author); Ramin Rahimi; Davood Mashhadi Heydar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
