Identifying Indicators of Teacher Proficiency in Assessment for Learning (AfL) Frameworks

Authors

    Pooya Delavarpour Department of Sociology, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
    Elham Safarnejad * Department of Psychology and Education, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran elham.sn664@gmail.com

Keywords:

Assessment for Learning, teacher proficiency, formative assessment, feedback, professional development, qualitative research, secondary education, Iran

Abstract

This study aims to identify the key indicators of teacher proficiency within Assessment for Learning (AfL) frameworks based on the perspectives and practices of secondary school teachers in Tehran. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews with 13 purposively selected secondary teachers in Tehran who actively implement AfL practices. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis facilitated by NVivo software. The coding process involved open and axial coding, constant comparison, and regular team discussions to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of the findings. Analysis revealed three overarching themes of teacher proficiency in AfL: (1) assessment planning and design, including alignment with learning objectives, variety of assessment methods, differentiation, clarity of assessment criteria, diagnostic assessment, and evidence-based design; (2) feedback and communication, encompassing timely, constructive, and student-centered feedback, clarity and accessibility, student involvement, ongoing communication, and sensitivity to individual differences; and (3) professional growth and reflective practice, characterized by self-evaluation, collaborative assessment culture, engagement in professional development, responsiveness to student data, and research-informed teaching. These indicators align with established models of assessment literacy and demonstrate the multifaceted nature of effective AfL practices in the classroom. This study highlights the complexity and multidimensionality of teacher proficiency in AfL, underscoring the interplay of technical, relational, and reflective competencies necessary for effective assessment. The findings support the need for targeted professional development, collaborative learning opportunities, and institutional support to foster AfL practices. Future research should broaden the scope and use mixed methods to triangulate perspectives and strengthen generalizability. Cultivating a reflective, evidence-based culture remains central to advancing AfL implementation and improving student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544

Azadi, G., Aliakbari, M., & Maftoon, P. (2022). Assessment for learning in an EFL context: Iranian teachers’ practices and challenges. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00181-2

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462

Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x

Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022

Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. Routledge.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001

Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900210

Heritage, M. (2013). Formative assessment in practice: A process of inquiry and action. Harvard Education Press.

Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646

Looney, J., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising feedback in the contemporary Australian compulsory education context: Implications for teachers and students. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0273-2

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations, when it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264262

Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., & Vanhoof, J. (2020). Exploring data use practices around the world: Commonalities and differences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 93, 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103112

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Smith, K., Cumming, J., van der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2014). Assessment literacy and teacher professional learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.848164

Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414

Tavakoli, P., & Baniasad-Azad, S. (2019). Assessment for learning in EFL classrooms in Iran: The missing link. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0087-2

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. Australian Educational Researcher, 40, 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9

Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.

Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

Submitted

2024-05-10

Revised

2024-06-15

Accepted

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Delavarpour, P., & Safarnejad, E. (2024). Identifying Indicators of Teacher Proficiency in Assessment for Learning (AfL) Frameworks. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 2(3), 1-10. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/56

Similar Articles

11-20 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.