Developing a Model of Citizenship Education in Smart Cities

Authors

    Zahra Gholami PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
    Hamideh Reshadatjoo * Associate Professor, Department of Crisis Management and Urban Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. reshadatjoo@srbiau.ac.ir
    Afsaneh Zamani Moghadam Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management,Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Keywords:

Citizenship education, Smart cities, Information technology, Support

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the aim of developing a model of citizenship education in smart cities. From the perspective of its purpose, this study is a fundamental–applied research. In terms of data, it used a mixed-methods design, and regarding its implementation method, it followed a grounded theory approach (based on interviews with experts). In the quantitative phase, survey models were employed to collect research data. The qualitative population consisted of academic experts and senior managers of the municipalities of Tehran, Tabriz, and Mashhad. A purposive non-random sampling method was used, and according to the principle of theoretical saturation, 20 participants were selected as the qualitative sample. The quantitative population included 68,000 managers and employees of the Tehran Municipality. To determine the sample size for the quantitative phase, Cochran’s formula was applied, resulting in a sample of 380 managers and employees of Tehran Municipality. A multistage cluster sampling technique was used for sample selection in the quantitative phase. In the qualitative section, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, and in the quantitative section, a researcher-developed questionnaire was utilized. To ensure the validity of the instruments in the qualitative phase and to verify the accuracy of findings from the researcher’s perspective, the opinions of university professors and domain specialists were employed. The reliability of the interviews was established using the test–retest method and inter-subject agreement. For determining the validity of the questionnaire, face validity, content validity, and construct validity were examined. Reliability was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability, both of which were confirmed. Data analysis in the qualitative phase was performed using theoretical coding. In the quantitative phase, based on the research questions, descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis) were analyzed using SPSS version 21, while inferential statistics—including Pearson correlation and confirmatory factor analysis—were performed using SPSS-V21, SMART PLS-V2, and LISREL-V8 software packages. The results of the study indicated that citizenship education in a smart city encompasses dimensions such as educational objectives, content, and evaluation. Moreover, the factors influencing citizenship education in smart cities include dimensions of support and information technology, while the outcomes of citizenship education were identified as increased literacy and civic participation. In conclusion, a conceptual model was developed based on the grounded theory approach, which demonstrated acceptable validity.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anthopoulos L, Janssen M, Weerakkody V. A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for smart city conceptualization and benchmarking. Smart Cities and Smart Spaces: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications: IGI Global; 2019. p. 247-64.

2. Bastos D, Caballero A, Pereira A. Smart City Applications to Promote Citizen Participation in City Management and Governance: A Systematic Review. informatics. 2023;9(4). doi: 10.3390/informatics9040089.

3. Kitchin R. The Adoption Gap: Ethics, Citizenship, Institutional Factors, and Standards for Smart Cities. IEEE; 2021. p. 1-2.

4. Arabloo I. The Role of Civic Education in Urban Management and Its Impact on Quality of Life and Urban Development. 2021.

5. Torbati AA. Investigating the Obstacles and Challenges to Achieving the Goals Stemming from the Development Programs of Tehran in Urban Management, Transportation, and Traffic - With Emphasis on Education and Cultural Development. Tehran Municipality; 2010.

6. Mohammadpour Zarandi S, Tabatabai Mazdabadi SM. Optimal Implementation of E-Learning and Its Impact on the Economic Performance of Tehran Municipality Managers. Journal of Urban Economy and Management. 2012;4(1):1-13.

7. Hollandsworth R, Donovan J, Welch M. Digital Citizenship: You Can't Go Home Again. TechTrends. 2017:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0190-4.

8. Kolotouchkina O, Barroso CL, Sánchez JLM. Smart cities, the digital divide, and people with disabilities. Cities. 2022;123:103613. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103613.

9. Huda M, Sabani N, Shahrill M, Jasmi KA, Basiron B, Mustari MI. Empowering Learning Culture as Student Identity Construction in Higher Education. Student Culture and Identity in Higher Education: IGI Global; 2017. p. 160-79.

10. Fathi Vajargah K, Mohammadi F. Fundamentals of Quality Management in Education and Human Resource Development: Ayizh; 2013.

11. Masiha Pour MH, Akbarian M. Smart City Development: The Necessity of Creating an Electronic City. Permanent Secretariat of the Conference; 2016.

12. Ghorchian NG, Eftekharezadeh F. Presenting a Model for Training Professional Citizens in the Higher Education System of the Third Millennium. Future Research in Management. 2006;8(18):80-67.

13. Fazouni Sharjini R, Piri M, Asadian S. Challenges of the Social Studies Curriculum in Primary Education for Social Citizenship Education Based on the Tyler Model. Theory and Practice in Curriculum Studies. 2016;4(7):80-55. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cstp.4.7.55.

14. Sincer I, Severiens S, Volman M. Teaching diversity in citizenship education: Context-related teacher understandings and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019;78:183-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.015.

15. Peterson A, Bentley B. Education for citizenship in South Australian public schools: a pilot study of senior leader and teacher perceptions. The Curriculum Journal. 2017;28(1):105-22. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2016.1184579.

16. Schneider A, Wickert C, Marti E. Reducing complexity by creating complexity: A systems theory perspective on how organizations respond to their environments. Journal of Management Studies. 2016. doi: 10.1111/joms.12206.

17. Ginsburg L, Berta W, Baumbusch J, Rohit Dass A, Laporte A, Reid RC, et al. Measuring work engagement, psychological empowerment, and organizational citizenship behavior among health care aides. The Gerontologist. 2016;56(2):e1-e11. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv129.

18. Przeybilovicz E, Cucha M, Tomor Z. Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies. 2023;48(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204.

19. Sargolzai A, Khodadadi Didani HR. Designing a Strategic Roadmap Model for Smart Citizens with a Data-Driven Approach. Quarterly Journal of Public Management Research. 2024;64:349-74.

20. Tofighi Sardroudi Asl P, Karami F, Ghanbari A. Examining the Role of Smartphones in Shaping Destination Image from the Perspective of Citizens in Tabriz Metropolis. Geography and Planning. 2023;27(83):39-48.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-10

Submitted

2025-08-02

Revised

2025-10-23

Accepted

2025-11-04

How to Cite

Gholami, Z. ., Reshadatjoo, H., & Zamani Moghadam, A. . (2024). Developing a Model of Citizenship Education in Smart Cities. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 2(4), 1-19. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/153

Similar Articles

61-70 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.