Mapping the Epistemological Dimensions of Educators' Assessment Literacy

Authors

    Zahra Karimpour Department of Educational Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
    Nima Bostani * Department of Psychology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran nima23.bostani@yahoo.com

Keywords:

Assessment literacy, epistemology, teacher beliefs, formative assessment, qualitative research, educational assessment, Tehran educators

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the epistemological dimensions of educators' assessment literacy by 
investigating how teachers conceptualize knowledge, authority, and purpose in the context of assessment 
practices. A qualitative research design was employed using semi-structured interviews with 21 
educators from Tehran, selected through purposive sampling to ensure disciplinary diversity. Data 
collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. All interviews were transcribed verbatim 
and analyzed thematically using NVivo software. The analysis process involved open coding, axial 
coding, and the development of categories to identify the underlying epistemological orientations within 
participants’ assessment practices. Three major themes emerged: (1) conceptions of knowledge in 
assessment, (2) sources of epistemological authority, and (3) the epistemic purpose of assessment. 
Participants demonstrated a range of epistemological beliefs, often blending objectivist and 
constructivist assumptions. While some emphasized standardization and objectivity, others valued 
context-sensitive, inquiry-based assessment approaches. Sources of authority included formal 
pedagogical training, institutional norms, disciplinary traditions, and personal experience. Teachers also 
varied in their views on assessment purpose, with orientations ranging from summative judgment to 
formative feedback and reflective practice. Tensions between policy demands and personal beliefs were 
frequently noted, highlighting the complex interplay of systemic and individual factors. The findings 
suggest that assessment literacy is deeply shaped by educators’ epistemological beliefs, which in turn 
are influenced by disciplinary, institutional, and experiential contexts. A reconceptualization of 
assessment literacy as an epistemic practice—rather than a purely technical one—is necessary. 
Professional development programs should incorporate epistemological reflection to support more 
coherent and critically informed assessment practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abolfazli Khonbi, Z., & Sadeghi, K. (2013). The use of assessment in university English classes in Iran: Instructors' attitudes and practices.

Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 3(2), 1–22.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,

21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1),

3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x

Brown, G. T. L. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Comparing primary and secondary teachers in New Zealand. Assessment

Matters, 3, 45–70.

Buehl, M. M., & Fives, H. (2016). The role of epistemic cognition in teacher learning and practice: A call for research. In J. A. Greene, W.

A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 247–264). Routledge.

DeLuca, C., Coombs, A., & LaPointe-McEwan, D. (2019). Assessment literacy in teacher education: A Canadian perspective. Australian

Journal of Teacher Education, 44(8), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n8.2

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Approaches to classroom assessment inventory: A new instrument to support

teacher assessment literacy. Educational Assessment, 21(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1236677

Hill, M. F., Ell, F., & Eyers, G. (2017). Assessment capability: Building learning-focused relationships and practices. Assessment in

Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1293002

Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation

to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6

Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &

Practice, 16(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646

Looney, A., Cumming, J. J., van Der Kleij, F. M., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising assessment practice: Learning from students.

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(4), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319332

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536

Remesal, A. (2007). Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: The Spanish case. Building

Education, 1(1), 59–76.

Shirvani, H. (2009). Examining pre-service teachers' assessment literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Learning, 16(1),

405–412

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Submitted

2023-11-14

Revised

2023-12-16

Accepted

2023-12-27

How to Cite

Karimpour, Z., & Bostani, N. (2024). Mapping the Epistemological Dimensions of Educators’ Assessment Literacy. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 2(1), 1-9. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/33

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.