A Grounded Theory Exploration of the Dimensions of Assessment Fairness From Teachers' Perspectives

Authors

    Hanieh Jafari-Nezhad Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
    Salar Mohaghegh * Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran MohagheghSa1ar@gmail.com

Keywords:

Assessment fairness, grounded theory, teacher perspectives, procedural justice, distributive justice, interpersonal fairness, qualitative research, equity in education

Abstract

This study aimed to explore how secondary school teachers conceptualize and enact assessment fairness within their professional practice, using a grounded theory approach. This qualitative study employed a grounded theory design to investigate perceptions of assessment fairness among secondary school teachers in Tehran. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants, selected using purposive sampling to ensure diversity in gender, teaching discipline, and school type. Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software. Data analysis followed the constant comparative method, including open, axial, and selective coding to identify categories and develop a theoretical model grounded in participants’ experiences. Analysis revealed three major dimensions of assessment fairness from teachers' perspectives: procedural fairness, interpersonal fairness, and distributive fairness. Procedural fairness encompassed elements such as transparent criteria, consistency in grading, alignment with learning objectives, and appeal mechanisms. Interpersonal fairness involved respectful communication, cultural sensitivity, positive teacher–student relationships, and equal opportunity for expression. Distributive fairness highlighted equity in grading, accommodation for contextual barriers, rewarding individual progress, and avoidance of peer comparison. Teachers described fairness as a complex, context-sensitive construct that required ethical judgment, flexibility, and relational awareness. The study offers a comprehensive grounded theory model of assessment fairness that integrates ethical, pedagogical, and relational dimensions. It challenges narrow, standardized definitions of fairness and underscores the importance of teacher agency in navigating fairness dilemmas. These findings have implications for assessment policy, teacher education, and equity-focused instructional practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bloxham, S., den-Outer, B., Hudson, J., & Price, M. (2016). Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.

Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 221–256). American Council on Education & Praeger.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., Kim, D. H., & Pope, N. S. (2007). Ethics in classroom assessment practices: Issues and attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.042

Kane, M. T. (2010). Validity and fairness. Language Testing, 27(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349467

Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646

Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003

McMillan, J. H. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 3–16). Sage Publications.

Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). Curriculum reform in Iran: A historical perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.706530

Tierney, R. (2013). Fairness in educational assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125–144). Sage Publications.

Tierney, R., Simon, M., & Charland, J. (2011). Being fair: Teachers' interpretations of principles for standards-based grading. Canadian Journal of Education Administration and Policy, 117, 1–28.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

Submitted

2023-05-09

Revised

2023-06-08

Accepted

2023-06-20

How to Cite

Jafari-Nezhad , H., & Mohaghegh, S. (2023). A Grounded Theory Exploration of the Dimensions of Assessment Fairness From Teachers’ Perspectives. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1(3), 38-46. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/23

Similar Articles

31-40 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.