A Grounded Theory Exploration of the Dimensions of Assessment Fairness From Teachers' Perspectives
Keywords:
Assessment fairness, grounded theory, teacher perspectives, procedural justice, distributive justice, interpersonal fairness, qualitative research, equity in educationAbstract
This study aimed to explore how secondary school teachers conceptualize and enact assessment fairness within their professional practice, using a grounded theory approach. This qualitative study employed a grounded theory design to investigate perceptions of assessment fairness among secondary school teachers in Tehran. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants, selected using purposive sampling to ensure diversity in gender, teaching discipline, and school type. Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software. Data analysis followed the constant comparative method, including open, axial, and selective coding to identify categories and develop a theoretical model grounded in participants’ experiences. Analysis revealed three major dimensions of assessment fairness from teachers' perspectives: procedural fairness, interpersonal fairness, and distributive fairness. Procedural fairness encompassed elements such as transparent criteria, consistency in grading, alignment with learning objectives, and appeal mechanisms. Interpersonal fairness involved respectful communication, cultural sensitivity, positive teacher–student relationships, and equal opportunity for expression. Distributive fairness highlighted equity in grading, accommodation for contextual barriers, rewarding individual progress, and avoidance of peer comparison. Teachers described fairness as a complex, context-sensitive construct that required ethical judgment, flexibility, and relational awareness. The study offers a comprehensive grounded theory model of assessment fairness that integrates ethical, pedagogical, and relational dimensions. It challenges narrow, standardized definitions of fairness and underscores the importance of teacher agency in navigating fairness dilemmas. These findings have implications for assessment policy, teacher education, and equity-focused instructional practice.
Downloads
References
Bloxham, S., den-Outer, B., Hudson, J., & Price, M. (2016). Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 221–256). American Council on Education & Praeger.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., Kim, D. H., & Pope, N. S. (2007). Ethics in classroom assessment practices: Issues and attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.042
Kane, M. T. (2010). Validity and fairness. Language Testing, 27(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349467
Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
McMillan, J. H. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 3–16). Sage Publications.
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). Curriculum reform in Iran: A historical perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.706530
Tierney, R. (2013). Fairness in educational assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125–144). Sage Publications.
Tierney, R., Simon, M., & Charland, J. (2011). Being fair: Teachers' interpretations of principles for standards-based grading. Canadian Journal of Education Administration and Policy, 117, 1–28.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.