Designing a Model of Blended Learning at Alborz University of Medical Sciences Based on a Mixed Approach

Authors

    Marzieh Seyedabadi PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Kish Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish, Iran
    Parinaz Benisi * Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Parenazbanisi2017@gmail.com
    Abbas Khorshidi Full Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Keywords:

blended learning, educational agents, structure, management, implementation method, information and communication technology, frameworks

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the aim of providing a model of blended learning for Alborz University of Medical Sciences. The research method, in terms of objectives, is applied; in terms of data collection, it is exploratory mixed-method (qualitative–quantitative); and in terms of nature and type of study, it is grounded theory of the emergent type in the qualitative dimension and cross-sectional survey in the quantitative dimension. The statistical population in the qualitative section included experts in "medical education" and "educational technology." In the quantitative section, it included 340 faculty members of Alborz University of Medical Sciences (160 men and 180 women). The sampling method in the qualitative phase was purposive sampling of the snowball type, which reached theoretical saturation with 15 experts. In the quantitative phase, the sample size was determined using the Morgan sampling formula, resulting in 181 participants (96 women and 85 men). In the present study, after open and axial coding, the measurement tool was developed in the form of a structured form and sent to experts for selective coding and validation. Based on this process, a researcher-made questionnaire was designed and distributed among the selected statistical sample. Finally, the collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results showed that the blended learning model for Alborz University of Medical Sciences consists of six dimensions in order of priority: educational agents, structure, management, implementation method, information and communication technology, and frameworks. These dimensions are composed of 15 components and 111 indicators. The identified dimensions, within a coherent structure, support the constructs of the model under the concept of the blended learning model of Alborz University of Medical Sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anthony B, Kamaludin A, Romli A, Raffei AF, Phon DN, Abdullah A, et al. Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z.

2. Garrison R, Vaughan N. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Tehran: Avaye Noor Publications; 2022.

3. Sharpe R, Benfield G, Roberts G, Francis R. The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: A review of UK literature and practice: The Higher Education Academy, U.S. Government Printing Office; 2022.

4. Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Tamim RM. The state of research on distance, online, and blended learning: Meta-analyses and qualitative systematic reviews In - M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (4th ed., pp. 92-104). Routledge; 2019.

5. Bani Hashem SK, Badli M, Ali Abadi K, Pourrostaei Ardakani S. Developing an Integrated Model of Learning Design and Learning Analytics: A Constructivist Approach. Educational and School Studies. 2022;11(2):97-120.

6. Williams RT. An overview of MOOCs and blended learning: integrating MOOC technologies into traditional classes. IETE Journal of Education. 2024;65(2):84-91. doi: 10.1080/09747338.2024.2303040.

7. Lim CP, Wang T. A Framework and Self-assessment Tool for Building the Capacity of Higher Education Institutions for Blended Learning: UNESCO ISBN - 9789292235659; 2022.

8. Bruggeman B, Tondeur J, Struyven K, Pynoo B, Garone A, Vanslambrouck S. Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2021;48:100772. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772.

9. Winarso W, Udin T. Implementing Blended Learning Within the TPMK Framework to Enhance Mathematics Teachers' Competence. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 2024;8(4):2292-305. doi: 10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1599.

10. Khosravi Pour E, Khosravi Pour B, Musapour SK. The Necessity and Challenges of Implementing Blended Learning in Academic Environments. Civilica. 2022.

11. Talkhabi M. A Cognitive Approach to Blended Learning: Tehran: Mirat Publishing Institute for Learner Schools; 2020.

12. Enayati Novinfar A, Gholamali M, Seraji F. Presenting a Model for Implementing a Virtual Curriculum Based on Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2018;8(23):117-52.

13. Sharafi S, Hassanzadeh T, Zohoor V. Designing and Developing a Curriculum Model with a Blended Learning Approach for Secondary Education. Dynamics in Educational Sciences and Counseling. 2020;6(13):91-118.

14. Mirzaei K, Esmaili A. Blended Learning: Hamedan: Sepehr Danesh Publications; 2021.

15. Ghafrani A, Naranji Sani F, Shahhosseini MA, Abili K, Pourkarimi J. Designing a Blended Teaching-Learning System Model for Universities: Explaining Dimensions and Components. Civilica. 2023.

16. Karimi H, Kalati SH, Amini S, Jamalzadeh N. The Impact of Blended Learning on Nursing Process Learning: An Educational Evaluation Study. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2021;21(84):533-6.

17. Nouri Khanqah Z, Sadati L, Faryab Asl M, Karami S, Fathollahi S, Haj Firoozabadi M. The Impact of Blended Learning on Educational Outcomes of Associate Degree Students in Operating Room Technology. Research in Medical Education. 2022;14(1):24-31. doi: 10.52547/rme.14.1.24.

18. Rahmanian M, Soleimani H. Revisiting Technology in Learning: Self-Control and Self-Regulation in a Blended Course. Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages. 2020;9(4):1085-104.

19. Ghorbani S, Pishinian Pordanjani M, Oloumi F, Piri F, editors. Investigating the Impact of Blended Learning in Iran's Education System. First International Conference on Education with an Approach to Smart Schools, Creative Teachers, and Thoughtful Students in the Horizon of 2025; 2024: Bushehr.

20. Rahmani EF, Riyanti D, Misieng J, Sayok AK. A Review on Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Blended Learning on ELT in Indonesian Context. Jeels (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies). 2024;11(1):223-60. doi: 10.30762/jeels.v11i1.2326.

21. Liu B. Research on Personalized Teaching Strategies Based on Learner Profiles in a Blended Learning Environment. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 2024;20(1):1-25. doi: 10.4018/ijicte.346823.

22. Mahmoudi M, Mohammadi R. The Role of Blended Learning in Learning Effectiveness. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences (Negareh Higher Education Institute). 2019;39:141-8.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

Submitted

2025-01-06

Revised

2025-03-10

Accepted

2025-03-16

How to Cite

Seyedabadi, M. ., Benisi, P., & Khorshidi, A. . (2025). Designing a Model of Blended Learning at Alborz University of Medical Sciences Based on a Mixed Approach. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 3(1), 1-17. https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/103

Similar Articles

1-10 of 81

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.