Dimensions of Motivation in Student Self-Assessment: A Qualitative Perspective
Keywords:
Motivation, Self-assessment, Student engagement, Intrinsic motivation, Self-regulated learning, Qualitative research, Higher educationAbstract
This study aimed to explore the multidimensional motivational factors influencing student engagement in self-assessment practices within higher education settings. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with 15 university students from Tehran who had experience with self-assessment in academic contexts. Participants were selected purposively to ensure diversity across academic fields and educational levels. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using NVivo software to identify key categories, subcategories, and recurring conceptual codes. Thematic analysis revealed three major categories of motivational dimensions: intrinsic motivators, extrinsic influences, and self-regulatory processes. Intrinsic motivators included subthemes such as curiosity, self-directed goals, autonomy, competence, internal satisfaction, and reflective engagement. Extrinsic influences encompassed teacher expectations, peer comparison, family pressure, institutional culture, and recognition or rewards. Self-regulatory processes were reflected in goal-setting, effort monitoring, emotional regulation, feedback responsiveness, strategic learning behaviors, persistence, and adaptive help-seeking. While intrinsic motivation and autonomy enhanced authentic engagement with self-assessment, extrinsic motivators sometimes led to strategic or superficial involvement. Students who demonstrated higher levels of self-regulation tended to engage in deeper and more meaningful self-assessment practices. The findings suggest that motivational drivers are diverse, dynamic, and highly context-dependent. Student motivation in self-assessment is shaped by a complex interplay of internal drives, external pressures, and strategic behaviors. Educational environments that nurture autonomy, provide formative feedback, and emphasize growth-oriented learning can foster more authentic and effective engagement with self-assessment. Understanding the nuanced dimensions of student motivation can inform the design of more equitable, reflective, and learner-centered assessment practices in higher education.
Downloads
References
Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. Handbook of formative assessment, 90–105.
Andrade, H. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. Routledge.
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment (pp. 367–393). SAGE.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations, when it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576.
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 13–31.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Pearson.
Yan, Z. (2020). Student self-assessment practices: The role of goal orientations and perceived purposes of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100824
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1242–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
