Identifying Organizational Factors Affecting Assessment Policy Adherence in Higher Education
Keywords:
Assessment policy, higher education, policy adherence, organizational factors, institutional culture, leadershipAbstract
This study aimed to identify and analyze the organizational factors that influence adherence to assessment policy in higher education institutions. A qualitative research design was employed to explore institutional and cultural dynamics affecting assessment policy implementation. Twenty participants, including academic staff and administrators from various universities in Tehran, were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using NVivo software. Thematic analysis followed an inductive coding process involving open, axial, and selective coding to extract key patterns and relationships within the data. The analysis revealed three overarching themes: leadership and governance, institutional culture and values, and structural and resource constraints. Within the domain of leadership and governance, participants highlighted issues such as inconsistent policy communication, weak accountability mechanisms, and limited decision-making transparency. Institutional culture factors included faculty resistance to standardization, informal peer norms, ethical dilemmas, and departmental autonomy that often conflicted with formal guidelines. Structural and resource constraints such as lack of assessment training, limited support systems, excessive administrative workload, and fragmented monitoring infrastructures were also identified as major impediments to policy adherence. Participants emphasized that policy implementation is shaped by a complex interplay of formal directives and informal institutional realities. Adherence to assessment policy in higher education is influenced by a combination of leadership engagement, organizational culture, and operational capacity. To improve implementation, institutions must align policy with local practices, invest in faculty development, ensure clarity and accessibility of guidelines, and foster a culture of shared responsibility and ethical accountability in assessment processes.
Downloads
References
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019
Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide. Open University Press.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Routledge.
Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. Routledge.
Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801895786
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
Elwood, J. (2006). Gender issues in testing and assessment. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education (pp. 262–278). Sage.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning – tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500136093
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319745
Jessop, T., & Tomas, C. (2017). The implications of programme assessment patterns for student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 990–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1211994
Knight, P. (2006). The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679159
Kuh, G. D., Jankowski, N. A., Ikenberry, S. O., & Kinzie, J. (2015). Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of student learning outcomes assessment in US colleges and universities. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Newton, P. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478321
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2008). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292519
Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264262
Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. Routledge.
Shay, S. (2008). Beyond social constructivist perspectives on assessment: The centring of knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334970
Tan, K. H. K. (2013). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Pearson Education South Asia.
Yorke, M. (2011). Summative assessment: Points of vulnerability. In B. Hudson & M. Meyer (Eds.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 143–157). IGI Global.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
