<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3092-717X</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 5</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Teachers’ Strategic Use of Formative  Assessment to Support Students With  Learning Difficulties</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Teachers’ Strategic Use of Formative  Assessment to Support Students With  Learning Difficulties</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>9</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>17</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to explore how teachers strategically use formative assessment to support students with&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;learning difficulties in inclusive classroom settings. This qualitative research employed a&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;phenomenological approach to investigate the lived experiences of teachers implementing formative&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;assessment practices. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 30 teachers from&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;primary and secondary schools in Tehran, Iran. Participants were selected using purposive sampling,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;ensuring that all had direct experience working with students diagnosed with learning difficulties such&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;as dyslexia, ADHD, and auditory processing disorders. Interviews were transcribed and thematically&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework, supported by NVivo software. Theoretical&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;saturation was reached by the 30th interview. Three overarching themes were identified: differentiated&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;assessment strategies, pedagogical responsiveness, and professional and contextual constraints. Teachers&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;employed a range of adaptive techniques such as multimodal tools, scaffolded goal setting, and tiered&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;tasks to accommodate learners’ needs. Pedagogical responsiveness included real-time instructional&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;adjustments, emotional support, and culturally sensitive practices. However, systemic barriers—such as&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;institutional pressure, lack of training, and emotional fatigue—limited the consistent application of&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;formative assessment. Teachers emphasized the need for flexibility, emotional awareness, and studentcentered planning in their formative assessment approaches. The study reveals that while teachers&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;possess the skills and commitment to strategically use formative assessment for students with learning&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;difficulties, external constraints hinder full implementation. Effective formative assessment in inclusive&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;classrooms requires pedagogical expertise, institutional support, and an assessment culture that&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;prioritizes learning over standardization. Policy reforms and professional development are essential to&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;enable teachers to assess responsively and equitably.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Critical reflection</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">graduate education</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">assessment strategies</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">reflective pedagogy</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">qualitative research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">higher education</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">faculty development</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Tehran</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/download/36/30</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
